I seek independent professional opinion on the following matter/case
An alleged outstanding demand pertains to AY 2012-13. The assessee's position is that the demand was not payable, as the relevent taxes had already been paid. The assessee had submitted a response against the demand, duly supported by relevant documents/attachments.
Now, the Income Tax Department has adjusted the refund due for AY 2026-27 against the alleged old demand.
The Income Tax portal presently shows that a response against the outstanding demand was submitted, but the actual response, supporting attachments and AO's consequential order/reasons are not presently available/visible on the portal. The old physical records are also not readily traceable.
Proposed simultaneous action
I am considering taking the following three actions at approximately the same time:

1. RTI Application - seeking certified copiesof the response submitted by the assessee alongwith supporting attachments/documents and the AO's order/communication with reasons/grounds for rejection.
2. Income Tax Grievance - objections to the adjustment of the AY 2026-27 refund against the disputed old demand and requesting release of the refund.
3. Faceless Appeal - filing the appropriate statutory appeal, if mandatory/necessary, without waiting for the RTI outcome, in order to protect the assessee's appellate rights.

Opinion specifically requested

1. Is the above three-pronged approach legally and procedurally appropriate?
2. Should the Faceless Appeal be filed immediately, even though the old response and AO's detailed order/reasons are presently unavailable?
3. What is the correct appellate provision/order against which the appeal should be filed, and what limitation/condonation issues need to be considered?
4. If appeal is mandatory/necessary, please suggest the appropriate Grounds of Appeal, particularly regarding:
disputed/non-payable old demand duly supported with judiciary judgements, if any,
taxes already discharged
response previously submitted with supporting documents,
non availability of the old response/supporting documents and AO's reasons on the present portal
adjustment of AY 2026-27 refund against the alleged AY 2012-13 demand
requirement to verify the complete departmental record before recovery/adjustment

5. Should the RTI, grievance and appeal be pursued simultaneously, rather than waiting for one remedy to conclude?

6. What would be the safest and most effective legal strategy in the interest of the assessee?

Please give independent practical and legal opinion, particularly on the grounds of appeal and limitation/condonation aspect.

DEAR SIR

TODAY INCOME TAX SITE IS NOT WORKING ANY OFFICIAL EXTENSION WHETHER HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED

Opening valance of DTL 195731.00. current year closing wdv as per companies act 34,95,400.00 and IT act 2771830.00. Whatwill be the closing figure ? will it be DTL or DTA. someone calculated closing DTL as 7603.00 (195731- (3495400.00 -2771830.00)*26%). Is it corret method? pl. help with calculation.

iS audit mandatory in Income Tax , if commission income gross received 50,72,732/- for a DTH saler (commission based business, so he wants to show 80%-85% expencess ) ?

Respected Sir,

ITR FILING IN OLD REGIME
=====================
Professional Charges Receipt Rs 14,40,000
44-ADA income 50% Rs 7,20,000
Less Housing Loan Intt Rs 2,00,000
Less 80-C EMI Rs 1,50,000
====================================
TAXABLE INCOME RS 3,70,000
TAX LIABIITY RS NIL
=====================================
BANK has given us us duly authenticted repayment schedule wherein EMI and interest is very clearly visible. Howsoever some experts have advised us to file under new regime after filing form. Deductoin of EMI under secction 80-C in old regime may attract income tax notice which is an unwated headache.
WHAT TO DO SIR IN SUCH A CASE. PLEASE ADIVE ME AND OBLIGE DUE DATE BEING 31ST AUG 2026

sir,
Assessee runs her Nursing home. She earns around Rs. 50 Lacs from OPD and Rs. 40 lacs from IPD i.e. deliveries and operations carried out at her nursing home. Can I opt for 44ADA for OPD receipts and 44AD for IPD reciepts?
Question: - Presumptive Income sec 44ada only or both applicable

RESPECTED SIR

THIS IS ALL ABOUT AY 2026-27 OLD REGIME
=============================

INTEREST ON HOUSNG LOAN SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE HOUSE AND PROPERTY INCOME WHICH WILL REFLECT IN MINUS ( ALLOWABLE UPTO RS 2 LACS ) IN FY 2025-26

AND

EMI PAID SHALL BE CLAIMED UNDER SECTION 80-C ( IS THERE ANY LIMIT OF DEDUCTION OF EMI) IN FY 2025-26

AM I RIGHT SIR

Under Portuguese Civil Code Income needs to be apportioned between husband and spouse equally

My question is TDS deducted needs to be apportioned equally or each husband and wife will take credit of TDS as per their individual 26AS ?

My cliets Agriculture land And sum Non Agriculture land aqire for Road Development and receve compulsory land acquisition compensation from authority including 12% interst amont,
so what treetment regarding Agriculture land , Non Agiculture land, And Interst

RESPECTED SIRS

MY QUERY IS AS FOLLOWS:

I was under the old tax regime in March 25 but in March 26 inadvertenlty without withdrawal from the old regime and without opring new regime I have filed my ITR in new regime. What to do in such a case.