I filed the TDS return and later filed a revised return with the correct details. Due to this issue, the challan was frozen. However, we have now got the challan unfrozen.
Now, while applying for the refund through Form 26B on the TRACES portal, the system is showing the maximum refund amount as only 7473 against the total challan amount of 100000.00. We are unable to apply for the full refund.
I would like to understand the following:
Why is TRACES allowing a refund of only 7473 instead of 100000.00?
Is there any minimum refund amount or any other limit for claiming a TDS refund?
Could this problem be due to the original TDS return, revised TDS return, or challan details?
Since the challan has already been unfrozen, is any further correction or action required?
How can we claim the full refund of 100000.00 ?
Has anyone faced a similar issue and successfully received the full refund? If yes, please share the procedure.
I would be grateful for guidance from CAs and tax professionals who have handled similar cases.
Our objective is to claim the full refund of 100000.00 as the TDS was deducted and deposited by mistake.
Thank you for your help and valuable suggestions.
I have undisclosed account in ICBC bank China with around 21960 CNY since 2018 and currently it could be dormant. It was opened anticipating some potential business but not materialized due to COVID etc. However, now received SMS from IT system to utilize FAST DS26 scheme till Dec26. I have checked in compliance portal and see the account reflecting with balance of 21850 CNY and interest of around 110CNY for CY 2022 & 2023 ie total of around Rs 314,500. I have accepted the amounts in compliance portal. Now my query is should I utilize the FAST DS26 and pay Rs 189000 ie 60% of total balance as tax or will the Rs 20 lakh immunity protect me from 120% levy if I dont avail the scheme. I will have to consider the entire amount as income as the current account is dormant, i dont have any bank statements as of now and will not be able to show source etc as is very old and not sure if ICBC will share statements without reactivation of account etc. The deposits was by way of sale of samples I was carrying during that time. I have been resident all through. Please advise.
Answer nowDear Experts
I had salary and business income in FY 2023-24, so I filed ITR4 and submitted form 10IEA for opting old regime .
In FY 2024-25, I had only salary income. So I opted new regime without submitting form 10IEA.
In FY 2025-26, I had salary and business income again. So I filed ITR4 continuing new regime as I opted it last year. But income tax department now seeking a clarification for not submitting form 10IEA again this year. They are saying that this year income will be treated as per old regime since business income is there.
I am hopefully looking for your kind advice about how to respond to this query.
Hello Members,
I seek your guidance regarding a TDS issue on property sale.
My total TDS liability was INR 9,695.
I paid INR 9,635 on 7th November 2025, which was within the due date.
The remaining balance of INR 60 was paid later on 3rd September 2026 through a fresh Form 26QB.
Despite this, the Income Tax Department (ITD) has issued a defaulter notice and imposed a significant penalty on the amount of INR 9,635, which I had already paid on time.
I need advice on:
How to draft a reply to ITD clarifying that INR 9,635 was paid within the due date? To whom I should address, what is the email id?
How to link both Form 26QBs (acknowledgement numbers) to demonstrate that the full liability of INR 9,695 has been discharged?
Any expert inputs or references to relevant provisions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Somenath Dhar
I seek independent professional opinion on the following matter/case
An alleged outstanding demand pertains to AY 2012-13. The assessee's position is that the demand was not payable, as the relevent taxes had already been paid. The assessee had submitted a response against the demand, duly supported by relevant documents/attachments.
Now, the Income Tax Department has adjusted the refund due for AY 2026-27 against the alleged old demand.
The Income Tax portal presently shows that a response against the outstanding demand was submitted, but the actual response, supporting attachments and AO's consequential order/reasons are not presently available/visible on the portal. The old physical records are also not readily traceable.
Proposed simultaneous action
I am considering taking the following three actions at approximately the same time:
1. RTI Application - seeking certified copiesof the response submitted by the assessee alongwith supporting attachments/documents and the AO's order/communication with reasons/grounds for rejection.
2. Income Tax Grievance - objections to the adjustment of the AY 2026-27 refund against the disputed old demand and requesting release of the refund.
3. Faceless Appeal - filing the appropriate statutory appeal, if mandatory/necessary, without waiting for the RTI outcome, in order to protect the assessee's appellate rights.
Opinion specifically requested
1. Is the above three-pronged approach legally and procedurally appropriate?
2. Should the Faceless Appeal be filed immediately, even though the old response and AO's detailed order/reasons are presently unavailable?
3. What is the correct appellate provision/order against which the appeal should be filed, and what limitation/condonation issues need to be considered?
4. If appeal is mandatory/necessary, please suggest the appropriate Grounds of Appeal, particularly regarding:
disputed/non-payable old demand duly supported with judiciary judgements, if any,
taxes already discharged
response previously submitted with supporting documents,
non availability of the old response/supporting documents and AO's reasons on the present portal
adjustment of AY 2026-27 refund against the alleged AY 2012-13 demand
requirement to verify the complete departmental record before recovery/adjustment
5. Should the RTI, grievance and appeal be pursued simultaneously, rather than waiting for one remedy to conclude?
6. What would be the safest and most effective legal strategy in the interest of the assessee?
Please give independent practical and legal opinion, particularly on the grounds of appeal and limitation/condonation aspect.
Opening valance of DTL 195731.00. current year closing wdv as per companies act 34,95,400.00 and IT act 2771830.00. Whatwill be the closing figure ? will it be DTL or DTA. someone calculated closing DTL as 7603.00 (195731- (3495400.00 -2771830.00)*26%). Is it corret method? pl. help with calculation.
Answer nowHello,
I am looking for recommendations for experienced CA from Kolkata who have a track record of accurate balance sheet,PnL preparation and ITR 3 filing for FnO trading for individual trader by working online for document acceptance and communication. They should be transparent in disclosing their registration number and CoP. I will be obliged if anyone has any recommendations.
Sir
Greetings
Can I get clarification as to whether the Banks need to report interest details in Form 168 even if no TDS is deducted?
The present Form 168 has a separate table for reporting interest details when the customer submits Form 121. Moreover, the Banks earlier were reporting interest paid during the year in Q4 reporting, even when no TDS was deducted.
Thank you
Chari
I have sold goods of more then 77 lakhs by gst invoice in August 2026. Do I require deduction of tds from the party? Please clarify conditions for deduction of tds as sales were made from my gst proprietorship registered form??
Answer nowDear Sir/Madam,
I seek your expert advice regarding a tax demand of ₹4,650 raised by the Income Tax Department under Section 143(1) for AY 2026-27.
The relevant facts are as follows:
1.I was employed in the UAE from 3 March 2025 to 7 March 2026.
2.I was physically outside India throughout FY 2025-26. My passport records support this.
3.The entire salary income of ₹4,88,832 reported in my ITR relates to my UAE employment.
4.0I was treated as Non-Resident in the ITR, and the same residential status appears in the Section 143(1) intimation.
5.The CPC has included the entire ₹4,88,832 as taxable salary and calculated total tax liability of ₹4,657, against which only ₹4 TDS credit has been allowed, resulting in a demand of ₹4,650.
6.No interest or late-filing fee has been charged.
7.The salary was credited to my Indian bank account.
I would particularly like your advice on the following:
Whether the UAE salary of ₹4,88,832 is taxable in India, considering my Non-Resident status and the fact that the employment was performed entirely in the UAE.
Whether the fact that the salary was credited directly to an Indian bank account changes its taxability.
Whether the India-UAE DTAA, particularly the provisions relating to employment income, provides any relief.
Whether the amount should have been reported differently in ITR-2, such as under Schedule EI/FSI/TR or another appropriate schedule, if applicable.
Whether there is a valid and strong case for filing a Section 154 rectification request against the 143(1) intimation.
If rectification is appropriate, what exact correction should be made, and what documents/evidence should be submitted?
Should the ₹4,650 demand be paid while rectification is pending?
I would appreciate your professional opinion on the correct tax treatment and the appropriate course of action.
Kind regards,
Yousuf
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
Expert Help Required for TDS Refund 100000 Through TRACES – AY 2022–23