SCRUTINY
This query is : Resolved
01 October 2010
Is it necessary to appoint a lawyer for solving the scrutiny cases.
01 October 2010
NO ASSESSEE OR ANY AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE CAN ATTEND FOR HEARING.
01 October 2010
ASSESSEE OR A PERSON CAPABLE OF HANDLING SUCH CASES viz .CA/CS/CWAS OR ANY AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE .
02 October 2010
Agree,no need to appoint lawyer
03 October 2010
If you are confidant that you can furnish all he information that may be required by the assessing Officer during the course of hearing of your scrutiny assessment, you can appear in person and extend compliance. There is no mandate in law, that you need to appoint an attorney to represent your tax case.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CG Tax On residential property
- Post Office RD Interest
- Applicable TDS for Purchase of Flat from NRI
- Eway bill for machinery reparing
- Building and other construction workers welfare cess act 1996
- Bank Accounts in Balance Sheet for ITR 3
- Gift of mutual fund units to daughter
- ITR 3 FILING OF AN INDIVIDUAL (PARTNER IN A PARTNERSHIP fIRM)
- Annual return of gst limit
- TDS ON CASH WITHDRAWALS...
- Capital gain of property recd from partnership firm
- Delisted shares sold in off market/ Rebate u/s87A
- In Exports Sales HSN details where to fill
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
