SCRUTINY
This query is : Resolved
01 October 2010
Is it necessary to appoint a lawyer for solving the scrutiny cases.
CA Sanat Pyne
(Expert)
01 October 2010
NO ASSESSEE OR ANY AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE CAN ATTEND FOR HEARING.
Hemu Kapoor
(Expert)
01 October 2010
ASSESSEE OR A PERSON CAPABLE OF HANDLING SUCH CASES viz .CA/CS/CWAS OR ANY AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE .
CMA Ramesh Krishnan
(Expert)
02 October 2010
Agree,no need to appoint lawyer
03 October 2010
If you are confidant that you can furnish all he information that may be required by the assessing Officer during the course of hearing of your scrutiny assessment, you can appear in person and extend compliance. There is no mandate in law, that you need to appoint an attorney to represent your tax case.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Need to correct "Whether it is last installment " response in Form 26 QB
- " Income from House Property " in joint names of co-owners
- REGARDING TDS RETURN OF FORM 27Q
- Notice under e-Verification Scheme
- GST demand notice for ITC reversal against exempted supply.
- RCM ON SECURITY CHARGES FROM INDIVIDUALS
- How to get money back from delisted company
- ITC not to be taken in accounts & GSTR-3B
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
