ITR Filing
This query is : Resolved
10 June 2010
I have filing ITR-2 instead of ITR-1 as my income was from 1) Salary 2) Loss on HP (no carried forward loss) 3) other income .
Will there be any problem for that or should I revised the return with ITR-1
Please suggest
Will there be any problem for that or should I revised the return with ITR-1
Please suggest
10 June 2010
No problem. No need to revise.
Message likes :
1 times
10 June 2010
Filing return through using wrong ITR is invalid return. you inform the ITO and file correct ITR.
10 June 2010
Since the return of income in ITR-2 is ,in substance and effect,filed according to the intent and purpose of the Act, it cannot be treated as an invalid return. For further details pl refer section 292B of the Income tax Act,1961.
Message likes :
1 times
10 June 2010
Dear Sir.
Plesae explain. selection of wrong ITR also is covered Mistakes under sec.292B?
Plesae explain. selection of wrong ITR also is covered Mistakes under sec.292B?
10 June 2010
Dear Ramesh
It is mentioned in the ITR forms that XYZ form be used for pqr income.
But where it is not mentioned that the forms cannot be used if the income as mentioned are covered.
It is mentioned in the ITR forms that XYZ form be used for pqr income.
But where it is not mentioned that the forms cannot be used if the income as mentioned are covered.
10 June 2010
Ramesh Krishnan Ji
A return in an inapplicable form doesnot render the same as invalid.
Citations:-
1)Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd Vs. CIT (1973) 90 ITR 236(All).
2)CIT Vs. Royal Textiles 120 ITR 506(Mad).
Coming to section 292B ,the Mumbai ITAT has examined the rationale behind the section. They said, substance over form is the idea behind
the section. If the substance is O.K, form has no relavance.
So let me conclude that my understanding on the issue is correct and my earlier answer needs no correction.
A return in an inapplicable form doesnot render the same as invalid.
Citations:-
1)Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd Vs. CIT (1973) 90 ITR 236(All).
2)CIT Vs. Royal Textiles 120 ITR 506(Mad).
Coming to section 292B ,the Mumbai ITAT has examined the rationale behind the section. They said, substance over form is the idea behind
the section. If the substance is O.K, form has no relavance.
So let me conclude that my understanding on the issue is correct and my earlier answer needs no correction.
10 June 2010
Thank you sir,Agreed
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Post Office RD Interest
- Building and other construction workers welfare cess act 1996
- ITR validation error - Balance sheet is not filled
- Bank Accounts in Balance Sheet for ITR 3
- ITR 3 FILING OF AN INDIVIDUAL (PARTNER IN A PARTNERSHIP fIRM)
- Annual return of gst limit
- Eway bill for machinery reparing
- TDS ON CASH WITHDRAWALS...
- Form 10BD Filling
- Registration as Authorised Representative of minor
- Change the gender in the registration of icai
- Lift replacement entries in housing society
- Delisted shares sold in off market/ Rebate u/s87A
- In Exports Sales HSN details where to fill
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
