banner_ad

CA Parul Saxena
07 February 2022 at 13:30

GSTR9 query Table 6 and Table 7

From Apr 20-Sep20-Gross ITC-Rs1000 and Discount-Rs.100 i have shown in Table 4(A)=Rs.900 (1000-100)
From Oct 20-Mar 2021-Gross ITC-Rs.2000 and Discount-Rs.500 i have shown in Table 4(A)-2000 and Table 4(B)-Rs.500 (Reason being from oct 20 onwards System computed 3B depicted CDNR fig in such a way so i adopted such presentation like showing reversal under Table 4(B))

Now my query is in Annual return GSTR9 now how to present such data?

Method 1:- Table 6-Rs.2900 and under Table 7-Rs.500
Method 2:-Table 6-Rs.3000 and Table 7-Rs.600


jaigurudev
31 January 2022 at 17:53

Gstr rate allicable

dear sir, i purchase packing material @18 gst and 12% gst and use for oil packing and sold @5% gst and hence gst payable is nil.gst officer want that i should pay gst.please advice me where is i am wrong?


NIRMAL DAVE

Dear All,

I have certain question regarding GST as below:

1. Manufacturing Company receive labor service in relation to packing of goods from one contractor. Contractor is unregistered person in GST. Whether company is liable to pay GST under RCM in such situation?

2. A manufacturing company import certain goods under advance authorization scheme. Whether a company need to pay IGST under RCM in such a case?

3. A Manufacturing company take the advantage of advance authorization scheme and not paying IGST on import. In such a case is company eligible to claim refund of IGST paid on export done by it?

Please do the needful.

Thanking You.


phanikumar

Sir,

Delhi Interstate Supplier has supplied goods on "Door Delivery" basis through GTA Transporter (Freight on 'TO-PAY' basis) and generated e-waybill as well as Invoice both Billed to and Shipped to in favour of 'A' Party at Vijayawada Godown (Andhra Pradesh State), but 'A' Party managed GTA transporter to deliver the goods to his dealer at Kakinada (Andhra Pradesh State) under cover of his ('A' Party) Invoice and e-Waybiil from Vijayawada (Andhra Pradesh State) to Kakinada (Andhra Pradesh State) in the same Vehicle and Transport.

Kakinada Party will pay Freight Charges directly to GTA Transporter as per agreement between 'A' Party and Kakinada Party and 'A' Party does not bear Freight Charges. Delhi Supplier is unaware of the said transaction.

My doubt is that whether Tax under RCM is liable to pay by Kakinada Party or 'A' Party is liable to pay as the Interstate Dealer has generated Ewaybiil / Invoice and L/R is up to Vijayawada (Andhra Pradesh State) destination in favour of 'A' Party.

Please clarify my doubt Sir


sakthees
07 February 2022 at 13:30

Difference tax

Sir,
we are raising invoice to our customer vide Inv No.0001/21-22 Dt.09.12.2021 value of Rs.42716/-(Value-Rs.36200/-+C-Rs.3258/-+S-Rs.3258/-(18%).GSTR1 also filed.Now the customer asked and argued to us, it is actual GST rate 12% we will accept the same and they want to raised credit note for the difference tax only (Value-Rs.36200/-+C-Rs.2172/-+S-Rs.2172/-).How to we made the credit note for difference tax amount in tally .pleas anyone suggest me


Rakesh Sharma
31 January 2022 at 15:56

GTA not filed Return

Dear Experts, some GTA have not filed their return, so auto population of RCM liability has not come in GSTR 3B. We have to fill it manually in liability column, but when we fill it in ITC Column, its tile become "RED". Every time we are facing this problem.

Kindly guide us how to get it permanently resolved.

Regards,

Rakesh Sharma


Amit Joshi

Hi, I have filed GSTR-1 of September 2017 of SEZ supply with payment of Duty but filles GSTR-3B in column No. 3.1 (a)outward taxable supply other then zero rated instead of 3.1 (b) outward taxable supply Zero rated. so email received from ICEGATE that Invoices not transmitted to ICEGATE because of Negative ledger balance. You may use table 3.1(b) of subsequent GSTR-3B to fulfil this difference and the GST System shall transmit invoices upon successful validation.

this transaction is f.y. 2017-18 how to solve in this year


CA Parul Saxena
31 January 2022 at 10:08

GSTR9 Table 8 Query

Input as per 2A is more than Input as per GSTR3B..reason being some of input was not availed and some was ineligible.
The query is whether is it mandatory to provide the details of difference in point 8(e) and 8(f) i mean is it mandatory or we can go ahead without giving reason of difference


Daya
31 January 2022 at 10:07

RCM applicable on manpower services

whether RCM applicable on Manpower services received .


M.G CHARY
30 January 2022 at 11:36

Proof of Purchase

Dear All,

Please suggest one of my client propose to purchase waste human hair from house wifes for small amount say Rs. 50/- 100/- within the state. sales may be in crores in a month.
and sells collected hairs to factory who manufacture wigs and other hair products
in this regard how my client prove purchases are made. how one should mange record of purchases






CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query

Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details