Sec-54
This query is : Resolved
31 December 2011
An assessee sale a residential one house,
and earned the LTCG if he will purchase the two new residential house, so can he claim as deduction of both house in section -54
Please reply soon
and earned the LTCG if he will purchase the two new residential house, so can he claim as deduction of both house in section -54
Please reply soon
31 December 2011
Hi Yogesh
The exemption is not limited to one house only... you can avail exemption by selling one house and buying two new houses or by selling two houses and buying one houses...So you can claim exemption u/s 54 in your case...
Regards
Yogesh
The exemption is not limited to one house only... you can avail exemption by selling one house and buying two new houses or by selling two houses and buying one houses...So you can claim exemption u/s 54 in your case...
Regards
Yogesh
Message likes :
1 times
31 December 2011
You may also like to note the case ref:
a) D.Anand Basappa v. ITO (2004) 91 ITD 53 (Bang),
b) ITO v. P.C.Ramakrishna (2007) 108 ITD 251 (Cheenai)
c) CIT V. D.Ananda Basappa (2009) 180 taxmann 4 (Kar.)
a) D.Anand Basappa v. ITO (2004) 91 ITD 53 (Bang),
b) ITO v. P.C.Ramakrishna (2007) 108 ITD 251 (Cheenai)
c) CIT V. D.Ananda Basappa (2009) 180 taxmann 4 (Kar.)
31 December 2011
Please also take care of the following case law
When more than one house is purchased - In case the assessee has purchased more than one house/flat within the period prescribed in section 54, it is for the assessee to claim relief against the purchase of any one of the house/flat provided the other conditions mentioned in the section are satisfied - K.C. Kaushik v. P.B. Rane, ITO [1990] 84 CTR (Bom.) 62.
When more than one house is purchased - In case the assessee has purchased more than one house/flat within the period prescribed in section 54, it is for the assessee to claim relief against the purchase of any one of the house/flat provided the other conditions mentioned in the section are satisfied - K.C. Kaushik v. P.B. Rane, ITO [1990] 84 CTR (Bom.) 62.
Message likes :
1 times
01 January 2012
This is a contentious issue. Courts have delivered divergent decisions. The latest decision,among others, of Punjab and Haryana high court says exemption is available in respect of ONE HOUSE only if invested in more than one residential house.
Citation :- Pawan Arya Vs. CIT (2011) 237 CTR 210.
Citation :- Pawan Arya Vs. CIT (2011) 237 CTR 210.
Message likes :
2 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Fixe term employment
- Is any professional CA is here please reply
- GST ITC REVERSE
- Reprocessing of rectification order AY 2025-26
- Gift Received from nonblood relative
- Section 50-fixed asset-->building ceases to exist
- Foreign lottery ticket bought online from India: legality, tax and consequences
- EXPORT BILL UNDER LUT FREIGHT CHARGE INCLUED IN INVOICE IT LIABLE TO TAX
- Putting a heading on received mail
- Tax Audit u/s 44AB for Transport Business A proprietorship is engaged in transportation business and
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
