Regarding the availability of the ssp exemption 33/2012
This query is : Resolved
24 January 2017
Dear
I had a query as regards to the application of the SSP Exemption 33/2012 as regards to the works contract for the original works of construction as the major part is the sale of the product .
Mine Client is the Partnership firm has entered into the work contract for Selling the paver tile along with the work of the laying at the site with a Section 12 AA institution . The product is sold in the brand name of the firm itself . The service portion in the work contact is below the 1000000. The query is that whether the SSP exemption would be available in case of the Service Portion of the work contract or not . As as per notification 33/2012 If the person is providing the Service under the Brand name and trade name of the itself than he is allowed for the availment of the SSP Exemption. Refrence of the 33/2012 is https://www.cbec.gov.in/htdocs-servicetax/st-notifications/st-notifications-2012/st33-2012
I had a query as regards to the application of the SSP Exemption 33/2012 as regards to the works contract for the original works of construction as the major part is the sale of the product .
Mine Client is the Partnership firm has entered into the work contract for Selling the paver tile along with the work of the laying at the site with a Section 12 AA institution . The product is sold in the brand name of the firm itself . The service portion in the work contact is below the 1000000. The query is that whether the SSP exemption would be available in case of the Service Portion of the work contract or not . As as per notification 33/2012 If the person is providing the Service under the Brand name and trade name of the itself than he is allowed for the availment of the SSP Exemption. Refrence of the 33/2012 is https://www.cbec.gov.in/htdocs-servicetax/st-notifications/st-notifications-2012/st33-2012
24 January 2017
SSP exemption is not available if service is provided under brand name.
27 January 2017
Dear sir the service is provided under the firms own brand name . As per notification no. 33/2012 that is allowed .
27 January 2017
If service is provided under firm's brand name and not institution's brand name then SSP exemption is available.
28 January 2017
Thanks for the reply. I would like your opinion what if the AO is saying that you are not allowed as this is after abatement. But this is not the case of abatement as the calculation is done merely the for the calculation of the Service portion in the execution of the work contract.
28 January 2017
If the calculation is for service portion whatever the AO say is not right.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- House Property Reporting in ITR
- TDS Claim year
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- Supply through E-commerce Operators
- TDS Challan Code
- Rent lease agreement
- Relief u/s Section 89
- Lease agreement and tax on sale
- REGARDING SECTION 44AE
- Is E Way Bill Valid If Transport ID Not Mentioned in PART A But Vehicle details mentioned in PART B
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
