House property
Querist : Anonymous
On the basis of facts he must have disallowed the claim of principal also.
.
It may be possible that your smart friend has made enough investment U/s 80C so as to cover his 1.00 Lac 80C limit and that's why the good hearted ITO did not touched Deduction U/s 80C. Please have a look at Form 16 of your friend.
Querist : Anonymous
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
- TDS 194-T applicability
- GST ITC REVERSE
- Fixe term employment
- Is any professional CA is here please reply
- TDS on TRUST
- RCM ISSUE ON RENT AND TRANSPORTATION CHARGES
- Foreign lottery ticket bought online from India: legality, tax and consequences
- Reprocessing of rectification order AY 2025-26
- Section 50-fixed asset-->building ceases to exist
- Putting a heading on received mail
- Regime change
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
