Challenging case study for consolidation any one can answer?
This query is : Resolved
04 November 2012
a holding company has 2 subsidiary companies S1 & S2. S1 holds preference share of S2 which has been purchased during the year. the financial position at the end of the year is as follow
comany S1 :- Investment 115000
Comapny S2 :Preference share 100000 and securities premium rs.15000
means preference shae has been issued with premium of Rs.15000
Please explain the treatment of the following on consolidation.
and one more point whether preference dividend has to be provide for as per AS 21
comany S1 :- Investment 115000
Comapny S2 :Preference share 100000 and securities premium rs.15000
means preference shae has been issued with premium of Rs.15000
Please explain the treatment of the following on consolidation.
and one more point whether preference dividend has to be provide for as per AS 21
06 November 2012
Dear Akash,
The percentage of holding in the subsidiary is not menitoned and hence is assumed to be 100%.
The treatment on consolidation is as follows,
1. The amount of investment of S1 shall be netted off from preference shares and the securities premium account, hence the net impact shall be that the amount of investments shall be the amount appearing in the consolidated accounts.
2. The preference dividend shall be eliminated since the preference shares are held within the group. However the Dividend Distribution Tax on the same shall be shown as a tax expense, since the same is an outflow outside the group
The percentage of holding in the subsidiary is not menitoned and hence is assumed to be 100%.
The treatment on consolidation is as follows,
1. The amount of investment of S1 shall be netted off from preference shares and the securities premium account, hence the net impact shall be that the amount of investments shall be the amount appearing in the consolidated accounts.
2. The preference dividend shall be eliminated since the preference shares are held within the group. However the Dividend Distribution Tax on the same shall be shown as a tax expense, since the same is an outflow outside the group
08 November 2012
i am 100% agree with you ...thanks sir
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- Multiple trade mark
- SALE OF MOTOR CAR BY REGISTERED INDIVIDUAL
- Transporter Declaration form
- Value of property in capital gain
- Copyright software
- LC charges in relation to Asset purchased should be Capitalised ?
- Regarding TDS Applicability For Director Remuneration
- TDS APPLICABILITY....../
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
- Address Change to another state of a Registered Trust with 12AB approval
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
