Vces section 106 (2)(a)(iii)
This query is : Resolved
17 December 2013
Can Client file VCES declaration if he has received communication from Superitendent Service Tax for Scrutiny in July 2012 for the year from 09-10 to 11-12 and no reply\submission made and matter is pending as on 01.03.2013. Will the matter come within scope of Section 106 (2)(a)(iii) ? Please advice.
17 December 2013
Dear friend,
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) is attracted if only in the situations mentioned therein. The scope has been fully explained at Q.No.4 of Frequently Asked Questions on VCES issued by the Board. The full details are available at https://www.cbec.gov.in/rhs-misc/vces/Customs%20Service%20Tax%20%20Book_PRS.pdf.
From the query, in my view, the declaration can not be rejected in view of Section 106(2)(a)(iii), as the communication received was in Jul-12 and till date you have not submitted any details. From this it appears that the information sought from you was of roving in nature. However, if a declaration is made with full disclosure, it a golden opportunity to get waiver from penalty, interest and other consequences and the benefit is available only upto 31.12.2013. Therefore, in my view, declaration can be filed and you sould get the benefit. This is my personal opinion and you may take an appropriate decision as per your wisdom.
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) is attracted if only in the situations mentioned therein. The scope has been fully explained at Q.No.4 of Frequently Asked Questions on VCES issued by the Board. The full details are available at https://www.cbec.gov.in/rhs-misc/vces/Customs%20Service%20Tax%20%20Book_PRS.pdf.
From the query, in my view, the declaration can not be rejected in view of Section 106(2)(a)(iii), as the communication received was in Jul-12 and till date you have not submitted any details. From this it appears that the information sought from you was of roving in nature. However, if a declaration is made with full disclosure, it a golden opportunity to get waiver from penalty, interest and other consequences and the benefit is available only upto 31.12.2013. Therefore, in my view, declaration can be filed and you sould get the benefit. This is my personal opinion and you may take an appropriate decision as per your wisdom.
17 December 2013
Dear friend,
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) is attracted if only in the situations mentioned therein. The scope has been fully explained at Q.No.4 of Frequently Asked Questions on VCES issued by the Board. The full details are available at https://www.cbec.gov.in/rhs-misc/vces/Customs%20Service%20Tax%20%20Book_PRS.pdf.
From the query, in my view, the declaration can not be rejected in view of Section 106(2)(a)(iii), as the communication received was in Jul-12 and till date you have not submitted any details. From this it appears that the information sought from you was of roving in nature. However, if a declaration is made with full disclosure, it a golden opportunity to get waiver from penalty, interest and other consequences and the benefit is available only upto 31.12.2013. Therefore, in my view, declaration can be filed and you should get the benefit. This is my personal opinion and you may take an appropriate decision as per your wisdom.
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) is attracted if only in the situations mentioned therein. The scope has been fully explained at Q.No.4 of Frequently Asked Questions on VCES issued by the Board. The full details are available at https://www.cbec.gov.in/rhs-misc/vces/Customs%20Service%20Tax%20%20Book_PRS.pdf.
From the query, in my view, the declaration can not be rejected in view of Section 106(2)(a)(iii), as the communication received was in Jul-12 and till date you have not submitted any details. From this it appears that the information sought from you was of roving in nature. However, if a declaration is made with full disclosure, it a golden opportunity to get waiver from penalty, interest and other consequences and the benefit is available only upto 31.12.2013. Therefore, in my view, declaration can be filed and you should get the benefit. This is my personal opinion and you may take an appropriate decision as per your wisdom.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Portuguese Civil Code IT Return
- Taxability of Partnership firm for FY 2025-26
- GST Rate for Catering Services
- IS AUDIT MANDATORY IF COMMISSION INCOME IS MORE THAN 50 LAKH
- TDS AND ITR ISSUE
- EMI ISSUE IN HOUSING LOAN OLD REGIME
- TODAY INCOME TAX SITE IS NOT WORKING ANY OFFICIAL EXTENSION
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
