Vces section 106 (2)(a)(iii)
This query is : Resolved
17 December 2013
Can Client file VCES declaration if he has received communication from Superitendent Service Tax for Scrutiny in July 2012 for the year from 09-10 to 11-12 and no reply\submission made and matter is pending as on 01.03.2013. Will the matter come within scope of Section 106 (2)(a)(iii) ? Please advice.
AJITHKUMAR M
(Expert)
17 December 2013
Dear friend,
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) is attracted if only in the situations mentioned therein. The scope has been fully explained at Q.No.4 of Frequently Asked Questions on VCES issued by the Board. The full details are available at https://www.cbec.gov.in/rhs-misc/vces/Customs%20Service%20Tax%20%20Book_PRS.pdf.
From the query, in my view, the declaration can not be rejected in view of Section 106(2)(a)(iii), as the communication received was in Jul-12 and till date you have not submitted any details. From this it appears that the information sought from you was of roving in nature. However, if a declaration is made with full disclosure, it a golden opportunity to get waiver from penalty, interest and other consequences and the benefit is available only upto 31.12.2013. Therefore, in my view, declaration can be filed and you sould get the benefit. This is my personal opinion and you may take an appropriate decision as per your wisdom.
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) is attracted if only in the situations mentioned therein. The scope has been fully explained at Q.No.4 of Frequently Asked Questions on VCES issued by the Board. The full details are available at https://www.cbec.gov.in/rhs-misc/vces/Customs%20Service%20Tax%20%20Book_PRS.pdf.
From the query, in my view, the declaration can not be rejected in view of Section 106(2)(a)(iii), as the communication received was in Jul-12 and till date you have not submitted any details. From this it appears that the information sought from you was of roving in nature. However, if a declaration is made with full disclosure, it a golden opportunity to get waiver from penalty, interest and other consequences and the benefit is available only upto 31.12.2013. Therefore, in my view, declaration can be filed and you sould get the benefit. This is my personal opinion and you may take an appropriate decision as per your wisdom.
AJITHKUMAR M
(Expert)
17 December 2013
Dear friend,
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) is attracted if only in the situations mentioned therein. The scope has been fully explained at Q.No.4 of Frequently Asked Questions on VCES issued by the Board. The full details are available at https://www.cbec.gov.in/rhs-misc/vces/Customs%20Service%20Tax%20%20Book_PRS.pdf.
From the query, in my view, the declaration can not be rejected in view of Section 106(2)(a)(iii), as the communication received was in Jul-12 and till date you have not submitted any details. From this it appears that the information sought from you was of roving in nature. However, if a declaration is made with full disclosure, it a golden opportunity to get waiver from penalty, interest and other consequences and the benefit is available only upto 31.12.2013. Therefore, in my view, declaration can be filed and you should get the benefit. This is my personal opinion and you may take an appropriate decision as per your wisdom.
Section 106(2)(a)(iii) is attracted if only in the situations mentioned therein. The scope has been fully explained at Q.No.4 of Frequently Asked Questions on VCES issued by the Board. The full details are available at https://www.cbec.gov.in/rhs-misc/vces/Customs%20Service%20Tax%20%20Book_PRS.pdf.
From the query, in my view, the declaration can not be rejected in view of Section 106(2)(a)(iii), as the communication received was in Jul-12 and till date you have not submitted any details. From this it appears that the information sought from you was of roving in nature. However, if a declaration is made with full disclosure, it a golden opportunity to get waiver from penalty, interest and other consequences and the benefit is available only upto 31.12.2013. Therefore, in my view, declaration can be filed and you should get the benefit. This is my personal opinion and you may take an appropriate decision as per your wisdom.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Amount transferred in HUF Account
- Nursery business
- Condonation Request sec 119(2) b -Enhancement Limit of Leave Exemption prior to AY 2023
- GST REFUND ISSUE ON PURCHASE OF PLANT AND MACHINERY
- TDS on Dashcam rent and allied services
- Working on Gold wastage during Melting of old gold jewellery
- Section 269ST applicability for capital introduced by partner to his partnership firm
- Gift to nri relatives residing in usa
- GST input credit on commercial property
- ETDS return q4 25-26
- GSTR-9C filing
- Royalty payments to the Mining Department for procurement of murum - GST input
- HOW TO ADJUST CREDIT NOTE AMOUNT ?
- Import Order Cancelled.
- WRONG GSTR7 ENTRIES ACCEPTED ERRONEOUSLY
- Expert Help Required for TDS Refund 100000 Through TRACES – AY 2022–23
- IMPORT PURCHASE ENTRY PASSED IN BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
- FAST DS 26 Undisclosed Foreign Asset Disclosure Scheme 2026
- Regime change
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
