U/s 54
This query is : Open
03 September 2015
One of my friend sold a site purchased by him 10 years ago.He purchased another site with the sale proceeds. After indexation of cost his ltcg showed negative amount. Both the transactions were below 30 lac.The same was reported in his ITR. but now a demand is raised for ltcg tax of 352000.
06 September 2015
it must be because the sale deed must have been made of lesser value than the value as per revenue records. So it must be the case of undervaluing the transaction and thus tax evasion
07 September 2015
but that can be found out only in scrutiny and not by 143(1) processing
07 September 2015
You didn't mention that demand was raised by 143(1) order.. In that case there must be some error on your part while filing return..Kindly pm me.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- House Property Reporting in ITR
- Internship/Academic shown in Salary Pay Slip of a Doctor
- TDS Claim year
- Rent lease agreement
- Liable to deduct tds and 44ADA
- TDS Challan Code
- Refund of 20%pre-deposit paid for stay application
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- Section 56(2) of the Income tax Act 1961 , Gift to relative .
- CCFS 2026 Schemed
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
