SECTION 6 (2)

This query is : Resolved 

08 July 2009 Respected all,

I m having one querry.

Suppose there are 3 parties

A FROM MUMBAI
B FROM BHIWANDI
C FROM TAMILNADU

IF A PLACES ORDER ON B FOR THE GOODS.

B SINCE NOT HAVING GOODS IN GODOWN, INSTEAD OF PURCHASING FROM C , B PLACED ORDER WITH C, & REQUESTED THEM TO SEND THE MATERIAL DIRECVTLY TO A.

PLEASE SUGGEST ME,

CAN WE INTERPRETE AS BELOW.

A SHOULD RECEIVE GOODS FROM C.

A SHOULD RECEIVE THE BILLING FROM B.

EVEN THOUGH A & B ARE IN MAHARASHTRA, B SHOULD MENTION IN IT'S BILL SALE "AGAINST C FORM" & CHARGE 2 %.

A SHOULD GIVE "C" FORM TO B.

B SHOULD GIVE "E1" FORM TO A.


AM I CORRECT???

PLS DO THE NEEDFULL.

SAMRAT

09 July 2009 A can receive the material from C,
C shall bill to B, and consignee adress to A, and A shall bill to B with full amount as per contract, enclosing invoice receivd from C.A should give "C" form to B, and accordingly B should E1 to A.

09 July 2009 Form Requirements:

A will give 'C' form to B
B will give 'C' Form to C.

Most Important:

C will give 'E1' form to 'B'.

09 July 2009 Friends,
Pls see the SC judgement in the matter of A & G Technologies 19 VST 239(SC).
Firstly the present transaction comes under Sec 3 i.e. Inter State Sale. Secondly there are two sales involved one is from B to A & another is from C to B. Thirdly there is a consistent case law stream mandating that if the sale occasions inter state movement then it cannot be effected by transfer of documents. Hence in the present matter
1. The dealer B should claim Sales u/s 3 Ist limb i.e. sale occasioning inter state movement as per the theory of inextricable link. The said theory is established as per SC judgments in K G Khosala, Indian Explosives etc
2. The present difficulty is due to the judgment in A & G sale by transfer of documents is not admissible. Hence there is no issue of E1 forms etc since the form is for sale u/s 6(2). For the sale to be under Sec 6(2) it should fall under second limb of section 3. Since the present sale would be under first limb that is not correct & the dealer may end up incurring the liability.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
Featured 18 July 2026
CA Articleship

apricus india

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
Article Assistant

G A R U D & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
Semi Qualified Company Secretary

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CS

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Senior Accountant

Arvindkumar Maniar & Co.

Rajkot

CA

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Senior Account (VA Client Operations)

Karbon Business

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 July 2026
CA semi qualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details