section 2(24(iv) of the IT Act 1961

This query is : Resolved 

15 July 2010 A director received a property from a company under a family settlement as per the award of the arbitrator under the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996. Whether such property be treated as a "Benefit or Perquisite" under section 2(24)(iv) of the Income Tax Act 1961? is there any case law in support of the assessee that it is not taxable under the above section?

16 July 2010 Personal family needs should be considered as benefit/perquisites under section 2(24)(iv) and the value should be arrived at the figure the director would have been spent otherwise, having regard to his/her family needs.

Benefit may be in capital nature also so as to attract the said section.
Citation:- CIT Vs. S.Varadarajan (1996) 89 Taxman 457(Mad).


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
22 June 2026
Finance Manager- Chartered Accountant

Triveni Turbine Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
05 July 2026
Financial Controller

NovumLake Partners

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
12 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Winshine Financial Services

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 15 June 2026
Senior Auditor

N. Dhawan & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
C.A./CA Inter OR pursuing C.A./GST/Accounts/Audit/IT - Head

Arvindkumar Maniar & Co.

Rajkot

CA

View Details
Company
10 June 2026
Senior Account Executive

JDS Advisory LLP

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details