banner_ad

section 2(24(iv) of the IT Act 1961

This query is : Resolved 

15 July 2010 A director received a property from a company under a family settlement as per the award of the arbitrator under the Arbitration and conciliation Act 1996. Whether such property be treated as a "Benefit or Perquisite" under section 2(24)(iv) of the Income Tax Act 1961? is there any case law in support of the assessee that it is not taxable under the above section?

16 July 2010 Personal family needs should be considered as benefit/perquisites under section 2(24)(iv) and the value should be arrived at the figure the director would have been spent otherwise, having regard to his/her family needs.

Benefit may be in capital nature also so as to attract the said section.
Citation:- CIT Vs. S.Varadarajan (1996) 89 Taxman 457(Mad).


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro

Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query



Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details