Payments exceeding >20,000- Re
This query is : Resolved
12 March 2008
Thanks everybody replying to my earlier query.
Yes in cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000/- technically/theoratically sec 40A(3) will apply where profit is calculated U/ss 44AD/ 44AE/ 44AF also. But how far it has teeth for an AO, as in such instances assesse can always claim that he has already taken such payments > 20,000, into account and while calculating the Profit and rate of Profit he/she has already adjusted the impact of non-allowable expenses u/s.40A(3).
CA Sampat Jain's reply/suggestion and citation[(CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar [1998] 229 ITR 229 (All)] is also important.
Yes in cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000/- technically/theoratically sec 40A(3) will apply where profit is calculated U/ss 44AD/ 44AE/ 44AF also. But how far it has teeth for an AO, as in such instances assesse can always claim that he has already taken such payments > 20,000, into account and while calculating the Profit and rate of Profit he/she has already adjusted the impact of non-allowable expenses u/s.40A(3).
CA Sampat Jain's reply/suggestion and citation[(CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar [1998] 229 ITR 229 (All)] is also important.
12 March 2008
It is the responsibility of the CA who signs the Tax audit report. And once the books are taken up for scrutiny that time it will create problem for the auditor for non performing his duty and for the management for not reporting such payments.
12 March 2008
THERE IS NO TAX AUDIT REPORT UNLESS AND UNTIL ASSESSEE CLAIMS LOWER INCOME
12 March 2008
UNDER SEC 44AE/AD/AF,IF ASSESSEE OFFERS THE PROFIT % PRESCRIBED FOR TAX PURPOSES, NO NEED FOR TAX AUDIT REPORT.
IF AND WHEN LOWER INCOME IS CLAIMED, TAX AUDIT REPORT IS A REQUIREMENT,AND THE SAME WILL COME UNDER SCRUTINY OF A.O.
ONLY THEN CAN THE ARGUMENT OF CLIENT THAT IMPACT OF NON ALLOW, EXP. ALREADY CONSIDERED CAN BE VERIFIED.
R.V.RAO
IF AND WHEN LOWER INCOME IS CLAIMED, TAX AUDIT REPORT IS A REQUIREMENT,AND THE SAME WILL COME UNDER SCRUTINY OF A.O.
ONLY THEN CAN THE ARGUMENT OF CLIENT THAT IMPACT OF NON ALLOW, EXP. ALREADY CONSIDERED CAN BE VERIFIED.
R.V.RAO
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Itr 1 processing
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- ITR 1: Details for showing Exempt Income
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- ITR returnFY25-26
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- Form 10E u/s 89(1). Need clarification because experts opinions differ !!!!
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
