Payments exceeding >20,000- Re

This query is : Resolved

Manish (Querist)
Follow

12 March 2008 Thanks everybody replying to my earlier query.
Yes in cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000/- technically/theoratically sec 40A(3) will apply where profit is calculated U/ss 44AD/ 44AE/ 44AF also. But how far it has teeth for an AO, as in such instances assesse can always claim that he has already taken such payments > 20,000, into account and while calculating the Profit and rate of Profit he/she has already adjusted the impact of non-allowable expenses u/s.40A(3).
CA Sampat Jain's reply/suggestion and citation[(CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar [1998] 229 ITR 229 (All)] is also important.

CA J M Pattanayak

CA J M Pattanayak (Expert)
Follow

12 March 2008 It is the responsibility of the CA who signs the Tax audit report. And once the books are taken up for scrutiny that time it will create problem for the auditor for non performing his duty and for the management for not reporting such payments.

CA Saurabh Maheshwari

CA Saurabh Maheshwari (Expert)
Follow

12 March 2008 THERE IS NO TAX AUDIT REPORT UNLESS AND UNTIL ASSESSEE CLAIMS LOWER INCOME

R.V.RAO

R.V.RAO (Expert)
Follow

12 March 2008 UNDER SEC 44AE/AD/AF,IF ASSESSEE OFFERS THE PROFIT % PRESCRIBED FOR TAX PURPOSES, NO NEED FOR TAX AUDIT REPORT.
IF AND WHEN LOWER INCOME IS CLAIMED, TAX AUDIT REPORT IS A REQUIREMENT,AND THE SAME WILL COME UNDER SCRUTINY OF A.O.
ONLY THEN CAN THE ARGUMENT OF CLIENT THAT IMPACT OF NON ALLOW, EXP. ALREADY CONSIDERED CAN BE VERIFIED.
R.V.RAO

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now