Payments exceeding >20,000- Re
This query is : Resolved
12 March 2008
Thanks everybody replying to my earlier query.
Yes in cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000/- technically/theoratically sec 40A(3) will apply where profit is calculated U/ss 44AD/ 44AE/ 44AF also. But how far it has teeth for an AO, as in such instances assesse can always claim that he has already taken such payments > 20,000, into account and while calculating the Profit and rate of Profit he/she has already adjusted the impact of non-allowable expenses u/s.40A(3).
CA Sampat Jain's reply/suggestion and citation[(CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar [1998] 229 ITR 229 (All)] is also important.
Yes in cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000/- technically/theoratically sec 40A(3) will apply where profit is calculated U/ss 44AD/ 44AE/ 44AF also. But how far it has teeth for an AO, as in such instances assesse can always claim that he has already taken such payments > 20,000, into account and while calculating the Profit and rate of Profit he/she has already adjusted the impact of non-allowable expenses u/s.40A(3).
CA Sampat Jain's reply/suggestion and citation[(CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar [1998] 229 ITR 229 (All)] is also important.
12 March 2008
It is the responsibility of the CA who signs the Tax audit report. And once the books are taken up for scrutiny that time it will create problem for the auditor for non performing his duty and for the management for not reporting such payments.
12 March 2008
THERE IS NO TAX AUDIT REPORT UNLESS AND UNTIL ASSESSEE CLAIMS LOWER INCOME
12 March 2008
UNDER SEC 44AE/AD/AF,IF ASSESSEE OFFERS THE PROFIT % PRESCRIBED FOR TAX PURPOSES, NO NEED FOR TAX AUDIT REPORT.
IF AND WHEN LOWER INCOME IS CLAIMED, TAX AUDIT REPORT IS A REQUIREMENT,AND THE SAME WILL COME UNDER SCRUTINY OF A.O.
ONLY THEN CAN THE ARGUMENT OF CLIENT THAT IMPACT OF NON ALLOW, EXP. ALREADY CONSIDERED CAN BE VERIFIED.
R.V.RAO
IF AND WHEN LOWER INCOME IS CLAIMED, TAX AUDIT REPORT IS A REQUIREMENT,AND THE SAME WILL COME UNDER SCRUTINY OF A.O.
ONLY THEN CAN THE ARGUMENT OF CLIENT THAT IMPACT OF NON ALLOW, EXP. ALREADY CONSIDERED CAN BE VERIFIED.
R.V.RAO
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- TDS on Consultancy- Non DTAA
- Depreciation of fixed assets- coop housing society in mumbai
- Reopen of assessment proceeding
- Gift Received from nonblood relative
- EXPORT BILL UNDER LUT FREIGHT CHARGE INCLUED IN INVOICE IT LIABLE TO TAX
- Reprocessing of rectification order AY 2025-26
- FTS Taxable under 115A
- Rental income gst and it purpose
- Management System (IMS)
- Foreign lottery ticket bought online from India: legality, tax and consequences
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
