Case laws u/s 271 (1) (c) of the it act


This query is : Resolved 

06 April 2018 various case laws u/s 271(1)(c) of the IT Act

06 April 2018 1. CIT V Rampur Eng Company Ltd (2009) 176 Taxman 211 (Del) - in the absence
of deliberate concealment of income penalty cannot be imposed.

2. Dilip N shroff V JCIT (2007) 161 Taxman 218(SC) - Primary burden to prove
concealment lies with the department to levy penalty.

3. K.C.Builders V ACIT (2004) 135 Taxman 461 (SC)-Penalty cannot be levied if
additions made by AO is deleted in appeal.

4.CIT V Reliance Petroproducts P ltd (2010) 189 Taxman 322 (SC) - A mere making
of a claim which is not tenable in law will not amount to furnishing of inaccurate
particulars of income, penalty cannot be imposed.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
21 August 2026
Finance Manager

Resollect Technologies Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 19 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

apricus india

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
17 August 2026
Chartered Accountant with US GAAP Experience

Austin Med Solutions Pvt Ltd

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
18 August 2026
CA Semi Qualifies

Goyanka and Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 11 September 2026
Audit Executive

RBSM Corporate Advisors Private Limited

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 August 2026
Article Assistant

RRPM & ASSOCIATES LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
Article Assistant

ANIVESH CONSULTANTS LLP

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details