Case laws u/s 271 (1) (c) of the it act

This query is : Resolved 

06 April 2018 various case laws u/s 271(1)(c) of the IT Act

06 April 2018 1. CIT V Rampur Eng Company Ltd (2009) 176 Taxman 211 (Del) - in the absence
of deliberate concealment of income penalty cannot be imposed.

2. Dilip N shroff V JCIT (2007) 161 Taxman 218(SC) - Primary burden to prove
concealment lies with the department to levy penalty.

3. K.C.Builders V ACIT (2004) 135 Taxman 461 (SC)-Penalty cannot be levied if
additions made by AO is deleted in appeal.

4.CIT V Reliance Petroproducts P ltd (2010) 189 Taxman 322 (SC) - A mere making
of a claim which is not tenable in law will not amount to furnishing of inaccurate
particulars of income, penalty cannot be imposed.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro
CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query



Company
Featured 12 March 2026
Customer Relationship Executive

TAXLET

Calicut

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details