This Query has 1 replies
if company increased in autorised share capital than the explanatory statement u/s are required to annexed theirto
This Query has 3 replies
A Public (Unlisted) Company is alloting shares to its shareholders without any premium at a face value of Rs. 10 per share.At the same time the Company is also alloting the shares to a Private Company at a premium of Rs. 10 per share and at a face value is Rs. 10 per share.
My query is whether the allotment of shares to this Private Co. at premium will amount to preferential allotment or not??
Plz guide me.
Regards
Priya Sharma
This Query has 3 replies
A is a director in a limited company.
A is getting 'only' commission from the company.
Can we say that A is an Executive Director or a Non-Executive Director ?
(Is it that if a director gets remuneration by way of any kind shall be obviously considered as Non-Executive Director)
Experts' response awaited.
This Query has 5 replies
If a director of Public Co. is a member of Co-operative society also, whether section 299 will be applicable on him or not??
This Query has 2 replies
Dear All,
Please let me know the meaning of Associate Company. Is it covered under company law.
This Query has 3 replies
If a Director is common in two companies and holds less than 2% of the paid up share capital of either of the companies, then whether exemption under section 299(6) will be available or not?
This Query has 1 replies
Some companies, in their P&L Account, they show separately 'Audit Fees' and 'Professional fee - paid to Auditor'.
Query :
What should we mention in the field -'Payment of Auditors in Form 23ACA' -
whether we should give only 'AUDIT FEE' in the 'field - Payment of Auditors'
and
mention 'Professional fee - paid to Auditors' in the 'field - Other Expenditure' in Form 23ACA
or
combine these two amounts and mention in the 'field - Payment of Auditors'.
Dear Experts, Please confirm the appropriate method.
Thanks for everybody.
This Query has 1 replies
a private company when fail to comply with restrictive clause becomes a public company by default.
now some members of the company(minority members) wanted to convert the company in to public. but majority of members has not accepted. then those minority members (eg.directors) wantedly went against the restrictive clause (eg. taking public deposit, increasing members to more than 50) with out the knowledge other members and gave a coverage that it happened accidently but not intentionally.
then is company converted into public by default. if so, can members take any action against the directors. can the members convert the company in to private if the directors are not accepting
This Query has 5 replies
can i have the form for shares transfer in a pvt co.
This Query has 2 replies
What Id The Difference Between Annual General Meeting & General Meeting & Board's Directors Meeting While It Is Conducted As Per Which Section It IS Complusory To Conducted What Are The Benefit Do the company derived ?
Please With A Brief Note & Examplesssssss ?
Section 25 OF The Compaines Cact, 1956 Detail Info In Depth More than It Is Given Under The Compaines ACt, 1956.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
Explanatory statement pursuant to section