Section 295 of the Companies Act, 1956 is not applicable to Banking Company. If a NBFC public limited listed company has given loan to its Directors and relatives of Directors then whether the provisions of Section 295 are invoked?
Please reply me as early as possible since it is very urgent.
Thanking you in advance.

Danish

I have formed a private limited company along with my two other friends 1.5 years back. We now want to issue some shares to a new investor. We haven't audited the Financial statements and the investor want to see the audited Balancesheet. I have one CA who was helping us in formation of a company but he is very busy now. We have receipts of almost 7 lakh and 6.5 lakh of expense and 5 lakh of assets. Can you please guide me how much time it may take to get us audited Balancesheet.

Can anyone guide me regarding maintaining statutory combined register, minutes books by a Pvt Ltd (new) firm? Preferably with some samples.

Thanks and regards
RK

Hai,

can anyone let me know the procedure to transfer the shares of unlisted public Company which have been pledged.

one point that should be considered is that the pledge has to be continued even after the transfer of shares.

Can any body provide MOA of a Travel,
& tour operator company.



Thanks

Gautam

Can any one tell me that is it correct that a person who has been authorised to act on behalf of company is eligible to authorise himself by signing the resolution passed for the same. Pls provide me the solution with reference to relevant section.

What is the procedure for creation of subsidiary by listed company? What are the legal requirements to be fulfilled?

Please explain me the process in detail as per sec 283 of the companies Act in regard to vacation of Director of a company who had not disclose his interest under section 299 or had taken loan under sec 295 of the Act.

Whether we have to File Form 32 for changes in director or there is any other way in this situation.

Dear Forum Members

The Authorised share capital of a public limited is Rs.15.25 crores divided into 12,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each and 32,50,000 preference shares of Rs.10/- each.

The paid-up capital is Rs.12,88,00,000/- divided into 96,30,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each and 32,50,000 preference shares of Rs.10/- each.

The company is going to convert the preference capital into equity capital as per original terms. The existing authorised equity capital is inadequate to accommodate the converted equity shares. The company also do not want the preference shares in the authorised capital. Hence it is proposed to alter the Authorised Capital clause as Rs.15,25,00,000/- divided into 1,52,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. This will only be a mere alteration in the existing authorised capital by passing requisite resolutions at an EGM. According to me no fees is payable to ROC as there is no enhancement in authorised capital (this is only interchange of the existing authorised capital)

Kindly advise whether the same will be in accordance with the provsions of the Act.

with regards

Muralidharan

Dear Expert Members

A private limited company wish to amend its Articles towards "Directors Qualification Shares" (Note : Section 270 is not applicable to private limited companies. However the company wish to amend the Article due to the condition levied by a financial institution while granting term loan)

I give below the proposed ARTICLE which is to be brought into the Articles of Association of the Company. I request the expert members to advise whether the said Article will be in compliance with the provisions of the Act. Please note that eventhough the financial institution has levied this condition it has not specified the number of shares to be held by the directors as minimum qualification shares. Hence I propose to keep the number of shares open which shall be decided by the board from time to time in accordance with the law. The following Article has been drafted keeping the above in mind.

"THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY SHALL HOLD QUALIFICATION SHARES IN THE CAPITAL OF THE COMPANY AS MAY BE SPECIFIED AND DECIDED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM TIME TO TIME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956."

with regards

Muralidharan