Sir Section 56(2)(x):
the following income Under Section 56(2)(x) shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head "Income from other sources”:
persons on or after the 1st day of April, 2017,—
(a) any sum of money, without consideration, the aggregate value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the whole of the aggregate value of such sum;
(b) any immovable property,—
(A) without consideration, the stamp duty value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the stamp duty value of such property;
(B) for a consideration, the stamp duty value of such property as exceeds such consideration, if the amount of such excess is more than the higher of the following amounts, namely:—
(i) the amount of fifty thousand rupees; and
(ii) the amount equal to 70[ten] per cent of the conside-ration:
Provided also that where the stamp duty value of immovable property is disputed by the assessee on grounds mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 50C, the Assessing Officer may refer the valuation of such property to a Valuation Officer, and the provisions of section 50C and sub-section (15) of section 155 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the stamp duty value of such property for the purpose of this sub-clause as they apply for valuation of capital asset under those sections:
Section 50C(3):
Subject to the provisions contained in sub-section (2), where the value ascertained under sub-section (2) exceeds the value adopted or assessed or assessable by the stamp valuation authority referred to in sub-section (1), the value so adopted or assessed or assessable by such authority shall be taken as the full value of the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer.

Means the provisions of Section 56(2)(x) will not apply in case the difference between the Stamp Duty Value and the Actual Consideration is not more than Rs.50,000/- or not more than 10% of Actual Consideration and no income is taxable under section 56(2)(x).

Sir
My Query:
The provisions section 56(2)(x) will apply or not in case the difference between the value ascertained under sub-section 50C(2) by DVO and the Actual Consideration is not more than Rs.50,000/- or not more than 10% of Actual Consideration. Which value to consider (DVO valuation or Actual Consideration)?

For example: Mr. A purchase house from Mr. B on actual consideration of Rs. 10,00,000/- where Stamp Duty Value of property is Rs. 12,00,000/- and the value ascertained under sub-section 50C(2) by DVO of the flat is Rs. 11,00,000/-. value ascertained DVO is not more than 10% of Actual Consideration.

Which value to be consider for income from other sources under section 56(2)(x) either Stamp Duty Value of property is Rs. 12,00,000/- or DVO valuation Rs.11,00,000/- or Actual Consideration Rs,10,00,000/-?
Regards
K M Goyal

Please give concrit open
Regards
K m Goyal

Late filing fees for latest correction has been received after filling correction statement
Then what is such penalty and what is time limit for filing correction statement for avoidance of additional late filing fees?

Respected Sir,
I'd 15 lakh in my account till April 2022 accumulated through bank fd, savings interest, trading and investment in stock markets and 5 lakh given by mother since 2002. From April 2022,I started applying IPOs in my mother, brother and maternal uncle's account taken on sharing basis,I allocated 4 lakh, 5 lakh, 4 lakh, 2 lakh to myself, mother's, brother's and maternal uncle's account respectively which grew to 6 lakh, 9 lakh, 9 lakh and 3 lakh respectively including savings interest on allocated capital till November 24. In December I took back grown capital from those accounts into mine. So my 15 lakh became 27 lakh now. I purchased 22 lakh liquid mutual fund in December 24 which I redeemed in March 25. All fund transfer was done (forward and reverse) through net banking only.

My question:
If AO asks me ever source of this 22 lakh in any scrutiny or notice or assesment in future,then how to explain and represent this case to ITD to pacify them ? My money is legitimate and I didn't cause any revenue loss to government.
Please help me I'm in dire straits and quite scared,
Thanks sir

I have prof. Income for f. Y. 24-25 yearly 7 lac. & provident fund ( EPF pension ) pension monthly Rs. 4000/- ( Fy. 24-25 = 48000/- )
Total income Prof. Charges & PF pension is yearly
748000/-.
Can I gate standard deduction on EPF pension. If yes, then what amount or proportion.
Pl guide

Sir,
Since FY 2019-20 / AY 2020-21, you can treat up to 2 residential houses as self-occupied.
Can a commercial property can treat 2 commercial property as self occupied.
If Yes any notification or circular?
If No any notification or circular?

Individual having salary income 1,80,000 and ₹5000 Interest filed ITR U for A. Y. 23-24. Late Fees of Rs. 1000 has been shown as Additional Tax Paid. No Original Return was Filed. So, the Whatever Income Offered in ITR U (Updated Return) is Additional Income. While Filing No Validation Error shown by Income Tax Portal and ITR is E-Verified immediately. Later, Dept. Made such ITR Invalid stating that - "As seen from Sch. Part B-ATI of the updated return filed by you, the same results in a refund. Hence, in accordance with clause (c) of the first proviso to sub-section (8A) of section 139, the said updated return filed by you is invalid, ab-initio, and is deemed to have never been filed."

But, I have not claimed any Refund in ITR.
Is Income is below 2,50,000 - that's why it is considered Late Fees ₹1000 Refund?
But, without ₹1000 Late Fees IT Portal Showing Validation Error after we Paid Late Fees and put Challan Details in ITR U then It accepts.
What Can Be The reason of such Invalid ITR Treatment?

When filing TDS returns under Section 194Q, some businesses combine multiple purchases from a single seller into one entry for simplicity. For example, a car showroom might consolidate monthly purchases from a supplier like Hyundai, totaling ₹10 crore, into a single transaction.

The Concern: While this streamlines reporting, could it trigger questions from the tax department about the source of funds? Individual entries clearly show the rotational nature of funds (sales revenue funding new purchases), but a single large entry might raise red flags about the origin of the ₹10 crore.

Dear Sir,

With respect to above mentioned subject line would like to confirm that whether is it mandatory to submit any kind of Form for providing intimation to Income Tax Department for submission of Income Tax Return for F.Y. 2024-25 i.e. A.Y. 2025-26 under Old Regime. If there is need to submit such Form then what shall be timeline for submission i.e. prior submitting Income Tax Return or is it fine to submit the form after E-Filing of Income Tax Return, kindly advice.

Warm Regards,
Aditya Ghatge

WHICH SECTION OF INCOME TAX EXEMPT SALARY OF MERCHANT NAVY OR SEAFARERS.

Sir,
I had purchased 9 lakh Axis overnight mutual fund on 12/11/24 which I redeemed on 25/11/24. Again bought 9 lakh Axis overnight mutual fund on 03/01/25 with same corpus which I redeemed on 25/03/25. So total money involved is 9 lakh only. But in AIS for AY 25-26, AMC has reported this as purchase of 18 lakh in 1 count cumulatively instead of 2 counts as if I have purchased high value 18 lakh at one shot which may be counted as high value transaction in AO's eye and I may be served notice or scrutiny may come.

My question:
How ro response and explain to AO if 143(2) or 148A or 69 notice is sent to me ?

Thanks