Market to market loss on the balance sheet date allowable
This query is : Resolved
14 May 2009
I made a sale of $10,000/- on 25th march 2009 where the rate was Rs.49
therefore entry passed
debtors a/c db 4,90,000
to sales a/c 4,90,000
now i have not received the money as on 31.03.2009 therefore i restate the debtors to the rate as on 31.03.2009 where the rate was Rs.45
foreign exchange loss a/c db 40,000
to debtors a/c 40,000
IS THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE LOSS OF Rs.40,000 ALLOWABLE UNDER INCOME TAX ACT
support ur answer by necessary notification/circulars/judgement etc.
therefore entry passed
debtors a/c db 4,90,000
to sales a/c 4,90,000
now i have not received the money as on 31.03.2009 therefore i restate the debtors to the rate as on 31.03.2009 where the rate was Rs.45
foreign exchange loss a/c db 40,000
to debtors a/c 40,000
IS THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE LOSS OF Rs.40,000 ALLOWABLE UNDER INCOME TAX ACT
support ur answer by necessary notification/circulars/judgement etc.
14 May 2009
Yes this is allowed under income tax act. This don't need to be supported by the case law/circular/notification.
It is prudent account concept, you can claim that.
It is prudent account concept, you can claim that.
14 May 2009
Dear,
Under Income tax act any forign gain or loss on account of revenue transaction, either reliased or unrealised is taxable or allowable as the case may be. You can take support from Delhi ITAT decision in the case of ONGC and Maruti India. Since in this exaple the loss is due to ssle transcaion, sale being a revenue transactions, losses are fully allowable. For further clarification let me know.
Under Income tax act any forign gain or loss on account of revenue transaction, either reliased or unrealised is taxable or allowable as the case may be. You can take support from Delhi ITAT decision in the case of ONGC and Maruti India. Since in this exaple the loss is due to ssle transcaion, sale being a revenue transactions, losses are fully allowable. For further clarification let me know.
14 May 2009
In my opinion, since the loss is not actual, it is not allowable.
The relevant judgement is R.D tradelink V/s Mumbai ITAT.
The relevant judgement is R.D tradelink V/s Mumbai ITAT.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Itr 1 processing
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- ITR 1: Details for showing Exempt Income
- Short Term Capital gain on shares bought and sold after 2018 onwards
- ITR returnFY25-26
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- ITR validation error - Balance sheet is not filled
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
