"cst included against c form" mentioned in transit sale inv
This query is : Resolved
12 January 2013
BY OVERSIGHT CLINT MENTIONED FOLLOWING IN SOME TAX-INVOICES MEANT FOR SALE IN TRNASIT U/S 6(2)
"CST INCLUDED AGAINST C FORM"
CST & FREIGHT INLCUSIVE AGAINST c FORMS"
c FORMS RECEIVED AND ISSUED AS WELL AS E-I FORMS RECEIVED AND E-II FORMS ISSUED. NONE OF THE CENTRAL FORMS ARE REJECTED
A.O DEMANDING C.S.T ON INVOICE AMOUNT CLAIMING PARTY HAS COLLECTED THE TAX FROM BUYER WHERE-AS PARTY IS CLAIMING THAT BEING TRANSIT SALE NEITHER HE HAS COLLECTED ANY CST NOR ANY TAX IS PAYABLE BY HIM AND HE IS MERELY INCLUDING CST PAID BY HIM ON CST PURCHASES IN SALE PRICE OF HIS INVOICES.
PLZ ADVICE REGARDING:
LIABILITY TO PAY TAX ?
SIMILAR CASE LAWS, JUDGEMENTS,
CASE LAWS ON REIMBUSEMENT OF CST PAID IN SUCH TRANSACTIONS
"CST INCLUDED AGAINST C FORM"
CST & FREIGHT INLCUSIVE AGAINST c FORMS"
c FORMS RECEIVED AND ISSUED AS WELL AS E-I FORMS RECEIVED AND E-II FORMS ISSUED. NONE OF THE CENTRAL FORMS ARE REJECTED
A.O DEMANDING C.S.T ON INVOICE AMOUNT CLAIMING PARTY HAS COLLECTED THE TAX FROM BUYER WHERE-AS PARTY IS CLAIMING THAT BEING TRANSIT SALE NEITHER HE HAS COLLECTED ANY CST NOR ANY TAX IS PAYABLE BY HIM AND HE IS MERELY INCLUDING CST PAID BY HIM ON CST PURCHASES IN SALE PRICE OF HIS INVOICES.
PLZ ADVICE REGARDING:
LIABILITY TO PAY TAX ?
SIMILAR CASE LAWS, JUDGEMENTS,
CASE LAWS ON REIMBUSEMENT OF CST PAID IN SUCH TRANSACTIONS
13 January 2013
The documentation can only support your claim either in the quotation given to the party or in the ordger placed by the client either if it is stated that the sale is under 6(2)b or E1/E2 sale it can be duly supported.
The copy of endorsed consignment note / LR / RR can also add support.
One can also take a legal argument in the case of all inclusive pricing where in the invoice it is mentioned as "CST included against C Form" that in the case of 6(2)(b) sale the CST is Nil and the same has been included in the price. It can be further supported that if the buyer fails to give the C Form to the seller, then the transaction would not qualify as sale under sec.6(2) and will suffer tax under clause (a) to proviso to sec. 9(1) of the CST Act. Therefore the CST rate is NIL provided the C Form is given by the buyer.
However if the dealer had shown the CST separately in the invoice to the customer, the argument cannot hold good and he would be liable to remit it to the govt. as it would amount to unjust enrichment.
The copy of endorsed consignment note / LR / RR can also add support.
One can also take a legal argument in the case of all inclusive pricing where in the invoice it is mentioned as "CST included against C Form" that in the case of 6(2)(b) sale the CST is Nil and the same has been included in the price. It can be further supported that if the buyer fails to give the C Form to the seller, then the transaction would not qualify as sale under sec.6(2) and will suffer tax under clause (a) to proviso to sec. 9(1) of the CST Act. Therefore the CST rate is NIL provided the C Form is given by the buyer.
However if the dealer had shown the CST separately in the invoice to the customer, the argument cannot hold good and he would be liable to remit it to the govt. as it would amount to unjust enrichment.
13 January 2013
Thanks for the info but some more queries are there:
All the forms received viz. C & E - I and even E-II forms issued by the Department.
Any settled case law for similar transactions ?
"RE-IMBURSEMENT FOR CST PAID BY THE CLIENT WHILE PURCHASING GOODS CAN BE CLAIMED AS INCLUDED WHILE MENTIONING CST INCLUDED AGAINST C FORM , YES OR NO, PLZ ELABORATE
All the forms received viz. C & E - I and even E-II forms issued by the Department.
Any settled case law for similar transactions ?
"RE-IMBURSEMENT FOR CST PAID BY THE CLIENT WHILE PURCHASING GOODS CAN BE CLAIMED AS INCLUDED WHILE MENTIONING CST INCLUDED AGAINST C FORM , YES OR NO, PLZ ELABORATE
25 July 2013
I agree with the expert
25 July 2013
I agree with the expert
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- ITDS U/S.194T of Firm
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- EXPORT COMMERCIAL INVOICE HSN CODE
- URGENT-Eligible leaves being shown as 24 days for 3 years Articleship instead of 156 days in 108
- ADDITION OF CHALLAN IN TDS RETURN FORM 140
- Cash balance limit and property purchases limit
- Non-Compliance documents have not been submitted by the contractors debited
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
