Tds
This query is : Resolved
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
05 August 2013
Dear Sir/Mam
>My friend is pursuing M.TECH from university and received stipend.
>which is exempt u/s 10(16), however TDS on that income is deducted by concerned entity.
>entity say you have to brings approval application from your A.O. then TDS not to be deducted. otherwise same thing going on.
please guide me what is the procedure to be followed for the same.....
>My friend is pursuing M.TECH from university and received stipend.
>which is exempt u/s 10(16), however TDS on that income is deducted by concerned entity.
>entity say you have to brings approval application from your A.O. then TDS not to be deducted. otherwise same thing going on.
please guide me what is the procedure to be followed for the same.....
CMA Ramesh Krishnan
(Expert)
05 August 2013
Sec.10(16) allows exemption only for the scholarship to meed the cost of education, not stipend. my view stipend is taxable under income from other sources. hence TDS deduction is correct.
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
06 August 2013
But SIR(Ramesh Sir) as i see various decision in Favor of assessee like.... 1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO. 2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
06 August 2013
But SIR(Ramesh Sir) as i see various decision in Favor of assessee like.... 1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO. 2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
06 August 2013
But SIR(Ramesh Sir) as i see various decision in Favor of assessee like....
1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO.
2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO.
2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
06 August 2013
But SIR(Ramesh Sir) as i see various decision in Favor of assessee like....
1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO.
2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO.
2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Query on effect of registration of property
- GST on reimbursement of expenses
- Due date for filing return for the partner in partnership subjected to Tax Audit
- Goodwill transfer of deceased father’s firm – ICAI applying a 27.04.2026 cut-off to the 3 year limit
- Number of years as per AS amortisation of Goodwill
- Additional trade name
- Whether output tax is taken credit by purchaser
- Equity Share Sale and Purchase
- Wrong CMPo8 file
- Visiting card purchase
- Classification of income of P Ltd company as business or profession
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Need to correct "Whether it is last installment " response in Form 26 QB
- " Income from House Property " in joint names of co-owners
- REGARDING TDS RETURN OF FORM 27Q
- Notice under e-Verification Scheme
- GST demand notice for ITC reversal against exempted supply.
- RCM ON SECURITY CHARGES FROM INDIVIDUALS
- How to get money back from delisted company
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
