Tds
This query is : Resolved
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
05 August 2013
Dear Sir/Mam
>My friend is pursuing M.TECH from university and received stipend.
>which is exempt u/s 10(16), however TDS on that income is deducted by concerned entity.
>entity say you have to brings approval application from your A.O. then TDS not to be deducted. otherwise same thing going on.
please guide me what is the procedure to be followed for the same.....
>My friend is pursuing M.TECH from university and received stipend.
>which is exempt u/s 10(16), however TDS on that income is deducted by concerned entity.
>entity say you have to brings approval application from your A.O. then TDS not to be deducted. otherwise same thing going on.
please guide me what is the procedure to be followed for the same.....
CMA Ramesh Krishnan
(Expert)
05 August 2013
Sec.10(16) allows exemption only for the scholarship to meed the cost of education, not stipend. my view stipend is taxable under income from other sources. hence TDS deduction is correct.
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
06 August 2013
But SIR(Ramesh Sir) as i see various decision in Favor of assessee like.... 1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO. 2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
06 August 2013
But SIR(Ramesh Sir) as i see various decision in Favor of assessee like.... 1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO. 2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
06 August 2013
But SIR(Ramesh Sir) as i see various decision in Favor of assessee like....
1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO.
2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO.
2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
jay prakash dubey
(Querist)
06 August 2013
But SIR(Ramesh Sir) as i see various decision in Favor of assessee like....
1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO.
2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
1) ITAT chandigarh bench in the case of Dr. Rahul Tugnait Vs. ITO.
2)Allahabad High Court Decision in the case of commissioner of income tax Vs B.L. Garg 3)Karnataka High Court Decision In the case of A. Ratnakar Rao Vs Additional CIT.. in all cases Department take it as taxable but as the decision given in above case... it is clarify The considerations which make up the concept of a “Scholarship/stipend for meeting the cost of education” in s. 10(16} are that the payment is intended to be an income receipt in the hands of the scholar and that whatever is paid is intended to meet the cost of education of the recipient. Since the purpose of the payment is to meet the cost of education, the question whether the quantum of payment is adequate or inadequate, or, is or is not in excess of the requirements are all beside the point. and also in the case of girish saran Vs acit the tribunal allowed that the tax payer claim exemption u/s 10(16)having preview the fact that the recipient does not spend the whole of the amount or saves something out of it or utilise for other purpose would not detract corrector of stipend/scholarship...
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Amount transferred in HUF Account
- WRONG GSTR7 ENTRIES ACCEPTED ERRONEOUSLY
- Nursery business
- GST input credit on commercial property
- GST REFUND ISSUE ON PURCHASE OF PLANT AND MACHINERY
- Working on Gold wastage during Melting of old gold jewellery
- TDS on Dashcam rent and allied services
- Intimation under section 245
- HOW TO ADJUST CREDIT NOTE AMOUNT ?
- Urd purchase entry in tally prime
- Subject: Legal Remedy for Removal of Income Tax Demand for AY 2024–25 – Charitable Trust
- Expert Help Required for TDS Refund 100000 Through TRACES – AY 2022–23
- IMPORT PURCHASE ENTRY PASSED IN BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
- FAST DS 26 Undisclosed Foreign Asset Disclosure Scheme 2026
- Regime change
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- FAST-DS 2026 Under Tax Law - No recourse or support for person declaring via this scheme?
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
