Section 269ss and 269t
This query is : Resolved
07 January 2012
Please guide me on following questions:
1. M/s ABC has taken cash loan of Rs.15000 from Rakesh on 15.04.2011. M/s ABC repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.05.2011. Further M/s ABC has taken cash loan of Rs.160000.00 on 20.06.2011 from Rakesh and repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.08.2011. Whether is it amounts to violation of Section 269SS and 269T.
2. M/s XYZ has taken cash loan of Rs.15000 from Rakesh on 10.04.2010. M/s XYZ repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.01.2011. Further M/s XYZ has taken cash loan of Rs.160000.00 on 20.06.2011 from Rakesh and repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.08.2011. Whether is it amounts to violation of Section 269SS and 269T.
3.M/s XYZ has taken cash loan of Rs.15000 from Rakesh on 10.04.2010. M/s XYZ repaid it to Rakesh in cash Rs.10000on 31.01.2011. Balance as on 31.03.2011 is Rs.5000.00 Further M/s XYZ has taken cash loan of Rs.160000.00 on 20.06.2011 from Rakesh and repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.08.2011. Whether is it amounts to violation of Section 269SS and 269T.
It is requested to elaborate the answer substanting with relevant Section.
1. M/s ABC has taken cash loan of Rs.15000 from Rakesh on 15.04.2011. M/s ABC repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.05.2011. Further M/s ABC has taken cash loan of Rs.160000.00 on 20.06.2011 from Rakesh and repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.08.2011. Whether is it amounts to violation of Section 269SS and 269T.
2. M/s XYZ has taken cash loan of Rs.15000 from Rakesh on 10.04.2010. M/s XYZ repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.01.2011. Further M/s XYZ has taken cash loan of Rs.160000.00 on 20.06.2011 from Rakesh and repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.08.2011. Whether is it amounts to violation of Section 269SS and 269T.
3.M/s XYZ has taken cash loan of Rs.15000 from Rakesh on 10.04.2010. M/s XYZ repaid it to Rakesh in cash Rs.10000on 31.01.2011. Balance as on 31.03.2011 is Rs.5000.00 Further M/s XYZ has taken cash loan of Rs.160000.00 on 20.06.2011 from Rakesh and repaid it to Rakesh in cash on 31.08.2011. Whether is it amounts to violation of Section 269SS and 269T.
It is requested to elaborate the answer substanting with relevant Section.
07 January 2012
Section 269SS provides, inter alia, that
"No person shall, after the 30th day of June, 1984, take or accept from any other person any loan or deposit otherwise than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft if the amount of such loan or deposit or the aggregate amount of such loan and deposit exceeds Rs. 20,000/-"
Similarly Section 269T prohibits repayment of loan otherwise than by an account payee cheque.
In the first case M/S ABC has violated the provisions of section 269SS and 269T
"No person shall, after the 30th day of June, 1984, take or accept from any other person any loan or deposit otherwise than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft if the amount of such loan or deposit or the aggregate amount of such loan and deposit exceeds Rs. 20,000/-"
Similarly Section 269T prohibits repayment of loan otherwise than by an account payee cheque.
In the first case M/S ABC has violated the provisions of section 269SS and 269T
07 January 2012
In the second case, the loan of Rs. 15,000/- taken and repaid in cash does not violate provisions of Section 269SS and 269T. However, the loan of Rs. 1,60,000/- taken subsequently and repaid in cash will be in violation of Section 269SS and Section 269T
07 January 2012
Even in third case the transaction of 1.6 lakhs would be in violation of Section 269SS and Section 269T.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- Type of Capital Gain
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Regarding ITR filing with more value than showing in AIS/TIS
- Exiting partner in partnership firm in gst portal
- NRI INSURANCE ADVISOR
- Average Cost Of High Quality Diamonds
- TAX AUDIT QUESTION
- Difff in ais receipts and gst turnover
- TDS _Long term Capital Gain ref.sec 214 Table 2
- Due Date Clarity
- Can a single LLP in India legally operate multiple unrelated businesses (Travel, Cloud Kitchen, Ecom
- Housing Society-ITR5
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
