Rule 6dd
This query is : Open
06 December 2012
If a company paid rs 2000 each to mtnl on telephone bill of his 20 employee in a single day in cash then section 40A(3) is attract or not.?
please consider rule 6DD exception also...
please consider rule 6DD exception also...
07 December 2012
NOT ATTRACTED.
MTNL has acknowledged this payment from your employees (if bills were on employee's name) and not from Company.
MTNL has acknowledged this payment from your employees (if bills were on employee's name) and not from Company.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- About TDS & Income Tax
- PPF interest-As Exempt Income disclosure
- Pass word to open justification report for Q1 for FY 2026-27
- Section 194JA & JB Income which ITR Form to use
- Scrutiny and reopening of past returns
- Type of Capital Gain
- Booth for sales promotion
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Regarding ITR filing with more value than showing in AIS/TIS
- Grand in aid
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
- 44ad eligble money lending interest
- Taxation in the hands of Landowner under JDA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
