18 May 2012
Sale Consideration 1,11,000 Less: Expenses on transfer 1,110 Net Sale Consideration 1,09,890 Less: Indexed cost of acquistion (17,000 * 785/140) = 95,321
Capital Gain = Rs. 14,569
If she has no other income tax liability shall be NIL.
However, if the amount of Rs. 14 lakhs is deposited in the bank then it is advisable to show the sale price as Rs. 14 lakhs.
18 May 2012
(Assuming residential house property) Cost inflation index for 1986-87 is 140 and that for 2011-12 is 785. Indexed cost of acquisition = 18,110 X 785 / 140=1,01,545. The long term capital gain=1,11,000 - 1,01,545 (Here is the catch... you have not mentioned Mkt value is of purchase or sale) I have taken it to be SALE???????
18 May 2012
purchase price on 1986 is 17000 and stamp duty paid at tht tym is 1110 sale price is 14lac. her income from other sources is 81000. now wt vl be her tax liability.
18 May 2012
purchase price on 1986 is 17000 and itz market price is 111000 and stamp duty paid at tht tym is 1110 sale price is 14lac. her income from other sources is 81000. now wt vl be her tax liability.
18 May 2012
Sale Consideration 14,00,000 Less: Expenses on transfer 1,110 Net Sale Consideration 13,98,890 Less: Indexed Cost of acquistion 95,321 LTCG Rs. 13,03,569
18 May 2012
Make sure you give these details: Type of Capital Asset. Purchase: Date, Cost, Stamp duty if any. Sale: Date, Agreement value, Market value for stamp duty purpose. I think Siddhartha Bhardwaj has made this amply clear. Hope you got the underlying theme.