Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c)


This query is : Resolved 

31 December 2011 That the A.O. has made best judgement/ ex party order and deemed income on net profit rate 3% as shown by other assessee of similar trade, he has not consider our past record ( N.P. rate 2.5% of the value ) and also initiate penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Can he made it . If no then suggest any citation / judgement etc.
Thanks in advance.

01 January 2012 CIT V Kailash Crockery House (1999) 235 ITR 544 (Patna).
This is a case in which G.P declared was 10.50% against which 15% is fixed by ITO. Verdict is penalty u/s 271(1)(c) will not sustain.

08 January 2012 The Mumbai ITAT bench in Narayansingh J. Deora vs. ACIT has held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) could not be levied where the addition was made on an estimate basis



You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
Featured 21 September 2026
Consultant - Reporting

Finrep Advisors LLP

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Article Assistant

SGNG & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Audit Executive

Thammana & Associates

Srikakulam

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
Article/ Paid Assistant

Murali and Sumeet Chartered Accountant

Bengaluru

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 September 2026
Industrial Trainee

Twenty Point Nine Five Ventures Private Limited

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
20 September 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Navin & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
27 August 2026
ACCOUNTANT

CHARUPREETI & CO

Noida

Graduate (Any)

View Details