Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c)

This query is : Resolved 

31 December 2011 That the A.O. has made best judgement/ ex party order and deemed income on net profit rate 3% as shown by other assessee of similar trade, he has not consider our past record ( N.P. rate 2.5% of the value ) and also initiate penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Can he made it . If no then suggest any citation / judgement etc.
Thanks in advance.

01 January 2012 CIT V Kailash Crockery House (1999) 235 ITR 544 (Patna).
This is a case in which G.P declared was 10.50% against which 15% is fixed by ITO. Verdict is penalty u/s 271(1)(c) will not sustain.

08 January 2012 The Mumbai ITAT bench in Narayansingh J. Deora vs. ACIT has held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) could not be levied where the addition was made on an estimate basis



You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro
CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query



Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 12 March 2026
Customer Relationship Executive

TAXLET

Calicut

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details