Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c)

This query is : Resolved 

31 December 2011 That the A.O. has made best judgement/ ex party order and deemed income on net profit rate 3% as shown by other assessee of similar trade, he has not consider our past record ( N.P. rate 2.5% of the value ) and also initiate penalty u/s 271(1)(c). Can he made it . If no then suggest any citation / judgement etc.
Thanks in advance.

01 January 2012 CIT V Kailash Crockery House (1999) 235 ITR 544 (Patna).
This is a case in which G.P declared was 10.50% against which 15% is fixed by ITO. Verdict is penalty u/s 271(1)(c) will not sustain.

08 January 2012 The Mumbai ITAT bench in Narayansingh J. Deora vs. ACIT has held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) could not be levied where the addition was made on an estimate basis



You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro

Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
Featured 28 May 2026
SEMI QUALIFIED/ CA DROPOUTS/ ARTICLES

T R SOOD & CO

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 May 2026
Article Assistants

Acupro Consulting

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Education Content Creator

Adyayam Education LLP

Bengaluru

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

ANV & Company

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Accounts assistant

Shubh Consultancy

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 May 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
04 June 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Goyal Puneet & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details