Penalty proceedings


This query is : Resolved 

Avatar

Querist : Anonymous

Profile Image
Querist : Anonymous (Querist)
07 April 2015 The assessee has filed ITR with business loss for the AY 2012-13.
As per order, an amount of 44,000 was disallowed as it was spent for purchase of laptop and shown in revenue expenditure by mistake.
The assessee has received a demand u/s 271(1)(c) saying that he has concealed the BOA.
Now, the assessee agrees for such addition and providing the necessary explanations to prove that its a mistake and there is no mens rea.
Is there any caselaw or judgement to boost up his explanation in order to avoid the penalty proceedings?

07 April 2015 If the assessee could prove that it was happened not willfully or not intentional, the AO may waive the penalty.
However, it is very difficult to prove so.

Avatar

Querist : Anonymous

Profile Image
Querist : Anonymous (Querist)
07 April 2015 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/535144/


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
08 October 2026
SALES TELECALLER

HIRE NOVA

Lucknow

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
15 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Continental Belting Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
26 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

pushpganga ventures

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
GST & TDS ASSISTANT

AGGARWAL SANJAY & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
10 October 2026
Accounts Associate Level 1

Abic and Mani Chartered Accountants

Kottayam

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 September 2026
Junior Accountant

J S P M & Associates LLP

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
Account Executive

Elite Taxation

New Delhi

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Trainee/ CMA Trainee

RMA And Associates LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details