intrepretation of "more clearly evident"?


This query is : Resolved 

(Querist)
16 March 2011 i was reading acccounting standards and came across this sentence in as-10.

in case assets are acquired for non monetary consideration then fmv of assets acquired or given up whichever is more clearly evident should be taken as cost of the asset.

My doubtfmv of asset acquired - 500000
fmv of asset given up-450000

what will be the cost of the asset ??

16 March 2011 well as per as--10 is that u can took the cost of asset which is more clearly evident . well in such cases took the value of lower one, because if u took higher one u got more dep this result in letter from dept. kkk

practically this works like this


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
20 September 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Navin & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article assistant

S.K.Bajpai & Co.

Noida

B.Com

View Details
Company
18 September 2026
Accounts & Finance Specialist

ULTRA CHEMICAL WORKS

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 12 September 2026
Assistant Manager - Finance & Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
Account Executive

Elite Taxation

New Delhi

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Trainee/ CMA Trainee

RMA And Associates LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
Article Assistant

MANUJ SHARMA AND COMPANY

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Assistant

Malhotra Rajesh & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details