intrepretation of "more clearly evident"?

This query is : Resolved 

16 March 2011 i was reading acccounting standards and came across this sentence in as-10.

in case assets are acquired for non monetary consideration then fmv of assets acquired or given up whichever is more clearly evident should be taken as cost of the asset.

My doubtfmv of asset acquired - 500000
fmv of asset given up-450000

what will be the cost of the asset ??

16 March 2011 well as per as--10 is that u can took the cost of asset which is more clearly evident . well in such cases took the value of lower one, because if u took higher one u got more dep this result in letter from dept. kkk

practically this works like this


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 15 June 2026
Senior Auditor

N. Dhawan & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details