House property
This query is : Open
10 September 2013
If house property is in joint name (assuming there are two joint holder Mr. A and Mr. B , share 1:1), and Mr. A is paying entire interest from his pocket, then can he claim 100% of interest paid u/s 24(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 even if his share in house property if restricted to 50%?
10 September 2013
Dear jayesh,
Please refer to
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/home-loan-repayment-by-nri-239605.asp#.Ui9hjX_G5rc
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/deduction-u-s-24-b-242342.asp#.Ui9i_H_G5rc
Please refer to
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/home-loan-repayment-by-nri-239605.asp#.Ui9hjX_G5rc
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/deduction-u-s-24-b-242342.asp#.Ui9i_H_G5rc
11 September 2013
Dear nikhil,
i am greatful for you support.
i opened these two links but in both links, expert's give their opinion by saying "i think".... They are not giving conclusive evidence by referring to any section or case law. Can you provide me such conclusive evidence which clarify the matter.
i am greatful for you support.
i opened these two links but in both links, expert's give their opinion by saying "i think".... They are not giving conclusive evidence by referring to any section or case law. Can you provide me such conclusive evidence which clarify the matter.
11 September 2013
Hi jayesh,
can you tell me more details: like is the house rented? or self occupied? approx interest paid?
can you tell me more details: like is the house rented? or self occupied? approx interest paid?
11 September 2013
yes sure, here are the details.
Mr. A has rented the property. interet Rs. 1,65,000.
Mr. A has rented the property. interet Rs. 1,65,000.
12 September 2013
Hi Jayesh,
if the property is rented out, then there should not be any issue in claiming 100% interest deduction.
I assume A and B are joint lessors in this deal and that the loan is in Mr A Name. Even then Mr A can claim Rs 165000 as interest expense against his share of rental income. There is no need for you to search for case laws as this position is anyways settled in the act itself.
Other experts may opine differently. However, the above position, I believe, is a settled one.
if the property is rented out, then there should not be any issue in claiming 100% interest deduction.
I assume A and B are joint lessors in this deal and that the loan is in Mr A Name. Even then Mr A can claim Rs 165000 as interest expense against his share of rental income. There is no need for you to search for case laws as this position is anyways settled in the act itself.
Other experts may opine differently. However, the above position, I believe, is a settled one.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- STCG....................................................
- Supply through E-commerce Operators
- TAN for Partnership
- Sales return eway bill
- Relief u/s Section 89
- AMOUNT RECEIVED UNDER COMPULOSRY ACQUISITION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND
- E way bill for tractors
- GST Registration Horse racing
- Section 43B(h) – MSME Invoice Paid Before Year End but After 45 Days
- Loan by Partnership Firm
- Section 54F - Exemption on LTCG in 2026 for HP purchased in 2023
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
