House property
This query is : Open
10 September 2013
If house property is in joint name (assuming there are two joint holder Mr. A and Mr. B , share 1:1), and Mr. A is paying entire interest from his pocket, then can he claim 100% of interest paid u/s 24(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 even if his share in house property if restricted to 50%?
10 September 2013
Dear jayesh,
Please refer to
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/home-loan-repayment-by-nri-239605.asp#.Ui9hjX_G5rc
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/deduction-u-s-24-b-242342.asp#.Ui9i_H_G5rc
Please refer to
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/home-loan-repayment-by-nri-239605.asp#.Ui9hjX_G5rc
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/deduction-u-s-24-b-242342.asp#.Ui9i_H_G5rc
11 September 2013
Dear nikhil,
i am greatful for you support.
i opened these two links but in both links, expert's give their opinion by saying "i think".... They are not giving conclusive evidence by referring to any section or case law. Can you provide me such conclusive evidence which clarify the matter.
i am greatful for you support.
i opened these two links but in both links, expert's give their opinion by saying "i think".... They are not giving conclusive evidence by referring to any section or case law. Can you provide me such conclusive evidence which clarify the matter.
11 September 2013
Hi jayesh,
can you tell me more details: like is the house rented? or self occupied? approx interest paid?
can you tell me more details: like is the house rented? or self occupied? approx interest paid?
11 September 2013
yes sure, here are the details.
Mr. A has rented the property. interet Rs. 1,65,000.
Mr. A has rented the property. interet Rs. 1,65,000.
12 September 2013
Hi Jayesh,
if the property is rented out, then there should not be any issue in claiming 100% interest deduction.
I assume A and B are joint lessors in this deal and that the loan is in Mr A Name. Even then Mr A can claim Rs 165000 as interest expense against his share of rental income. There is no need for you to search for case laws as this position is anyways settled in the act itself.
Other experts may opine differently. However, the above position, I believe, is a settled one.
if the property is rented out, then there should not be any issue in claiming 100% interest deduction.
I assume A and B are joint lessors in this deal and that the loan is in Mr A Name. Even then Mr A can claim Rs 165000 as interest expense against his share of rental income. There is no need for you to search for case laws as this position is anyways settled in the act itself.
Other experts may opine differently. However, the above position, I believe, is a settled one.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- TDS on Purchase of Immovable Property by NRI from NRI
- Capital gain from sale of house property
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- Current Account Opening for Sole Proprietorship with Udyam Certificate - Zero Turnover
- Multiple trade mark
- FORM 26A APPLICABILITY
- Before GSTAT- APL-02 Vs APL-04
- Annual return in Gst
- SALE OF MOTOR CAR BY REGISTERED INDIVIDUAL
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
- Address Change to another state of a Registered Trust with 12AB approval
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
