House property
This query is : Open
10 September 2013
If house property is in joint name (assuming there are two joint holder Mr. A and Mr. B , share 1:1), and Mr. A is paying entire interest from his pocket, then can he claim 100% of interest paid u/s 24(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 even if his share in house property if restricted to 50%?
10 September 2013
Dear jayesh,
Please refer to
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/home-loan-repayment-by-nri-239605.asp#.Ui9hjX_G5rc
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/deduction-u-s-24-b-242342.asp#.Ui9i_H_G5rc
Please refer to
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/home-loan-repayment-by-nri-239605.asp#.Ui9hjX_G5rc
https://www.caclubindia.com/forum/deduction-u-s-24-b-242342.asp#.Ui9i_H_G5rc
11 September 2013
Dear nikhil,
i am greatful for you support.
i opened these two links but in both links, expert's give their opinion by saying "i think".... They are not giving conclusive evidence by referring to any section or case law. Can you provide me such conclusive evidence which clarify the matter.
i am greatful for you support.
i opened these two links but in both links, expert's give their opinion by saying "i think".... They are not giving conclusive evidence by referring to any section or case law. Can you provide me such conclusive evidence which clarify the matter.
11 September 2013
Hi jayesh,
can you tell me more details: like is the house rented? or self occupied? approx interest paid?
can you tell me more details: like is the house rented? or self occupied? approx interest paid?
11 September 2013
yes sure, here are the details.
Mr. A has rented the property. interet Rs. 1,65,000.
Mr. A has rented the property. interet Rs. 1,65,000.
12 September 2013
Hi Jayesh,
if the property is rented out, then there should not be any issue in claiming 100% interest deduction.
I assume A and B are joint lessors in this deal and that the loan is in Mr A Name. Even then Mr A can claim Rs 165000 as interest expense against his share of rental income. There is no need for you to search for case laws as this position is anyways settled in the act itself.
Other experts may opine differently. However, the above position, I believe, is a settled one.
if the property is rented out, then there should not be any issue in claiming 100% interest deduction.
I assume A and B are joint lessors in this deal and that the loan is in Mr A Name. Even then Mr A can claim Rs 165000 as interest expense against his share of rental income. There is no need for you to search for case laws as this position is anyways settled in the act itself.
Other experts may opine differently. However, the above position, I believe, is a settled one.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITDS U/S.194T of Firm
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- Bank details not Visible on Traces Portal
- Taxability of Partnership firm for FY 2025-26
- TDS AND ITR ISSUE
- Need Professional Opinion - AY 2012-13 Old Demand & AY 2026-27 Refund Adjustment
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
