Company act
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
05 May 2012
if a company purchase a property in the name of the Director as "A.B.C. Dirctor of XYZ Co." and the payment is made by company,
whether this transaction is Benami?
and if property is purchased in personal capacity of Director and the payment is made by Company.
Whether this will amount to Benami?
whether this transaction is Benami?
and if property is purchased in personal capacity of Director and the payment is made by Company.
Whether this will amount to Benami?
24 November 2012
Having the same doubt
19 July 2024
The concept of Benami transactions in India is governed by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, as amended from time to time. Here’s how it applies to the scenarios you mentioned:
1. **Property purchased in the name of Director but payment made by the Company:**
- If a property is purchased in the name of a Director of a company (e.g., "A.B.C. Director of XYZ Co.") and the payment is made by the company, the transaction may potentially be considered as Benami.
- As per the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, a transaction is considered Benami if property is held by one person (the Director, in this case) but the consideration for it has been provided, paid, or provided by another person (the company).
- The Act prohibits Benami transactions, and the consequences can include confiscation of the property and penalties.
2. **Property purchased in the personal capacity of the Director but payment made by the Company:**
- If the Director purchases a property in their personal capacity and the payment is made by the company, this situation also raises concerns under the Benami Transactions Act.
- Even though the property is in the name of the Director personally, if the funds used for the purchase originate from the company (which could be seen as an indirect benefit to the Director), it may be deemed a Benami transaction.
- The intention and purpose behind such transactions are crucial in determining whether they fall under the Benami Act.
### Conclusion:
In both scenarios described, there is a potential risk that the transactions could be considered Benami under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The Act is aimed at preventing the practice of holding property in the name of one person while the consideration for it is provided by another, especially to evade taxes or other legal obligations.
Companies and Directors should exercise caution to ensure that property transactions are transparent, properly documented, and compliant with legal requirements. It’s advisable to consult with legal and tax professionals to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and to avoid unintended consequences under the Benami Transactions Act.
1. **Property purchased in the name of Director but payment made by the Company:**
- If a property is purchased in the name of a Director of a company (e.g., "A.B.C. Director of XYZ Co.") and the payment is made by the company, the transaction may potentially be considered as Benami.
- As per the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, a transaction is considered Benami if property is held by one person (the Director, in this case) but the consideration for it has been provided, paid, or provided by another person (the company).
- The Act prohibits Benami transactions, and the consequences can include confiscation of the property and penalties.
2. **Property purchased in the personal capacity of the Director but payment made by the Company:**
- If the Director purchases a property in their personal capacity and the payment is made by the company, this situation also raises concerns under the Benami Transactions Act.
- Even though the property is in the name of the Director personally, if the funds used for the purchase originate from the company (which could be seen as an indirect benefit to the Director), it may be deemed a Benami transaction.
- The intention and purpose behind such transactions are crucial in determining whether they fall under the Benami Act.
### Conclusion:
In both scenarios described, there is a potential risk that the transactions could be considered Benami under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The Act is aimed at preventing the practice of holding property in the name of one person while the consideration for it is provided by another, especially to evade taxes or other legal obligations.
Companies and Directors should exercise caution to ensure that property transactions are transparent, properly documented, and compliant with legal requirements. It’s advisable to consult with legal and tax professionals to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and to avoid unintended consequences under the Benami Transactions Act.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- STCG....................................................
- Section 54F - Exemption on LTCG in 2026 for HP purchased in 2023
- TAN for Partnership
- Treatment of Pension ?annuity returns on PMVY
- Sales return eway bill
- AMOUNT RECEIVED UNDER COMPULOSRY ACQUISITION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND
- Loan by Partnership Firm
- TDS related Query_Liquidated Damages
- Long Term Service award taxability in hands of company
- Free lancer income
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Standard Deduction claim for EPFO Pension and ICICI Prudential Life Annuity
- Small dealers gst returns filing
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
