capital gains sec 54

This query is : Resolved 

20 April 2009 can anyone elaborate on case no: 91 ITD 53 (Ban.)?

21 April 2009 answered

21 April 2009 The 2nd appeal in this case is decided by the Karnataka High Court in favour of the assessee.

Citation:- CIT Vs D.Ananda Basappa 309 ITR 329.

Facts and decision:-
Assessee sold a residential house and invested the proceeds in acquisition of two flats combined into make one residential unit. Revenue restricting exemption to invest in one residential house. Section 13 of General claues Act declares that whenever the singular is used for a word, it is permissible to include the plural. The expression "a" residential house should be understood in a sense that the building should be of residential in nature and "a" should not be understood to indicate a singular number.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro
CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query



Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 12 March 2026
Customer Relationship Executive

TAXLET

Calicut

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details