capital gains sec 54

This query is : Resolved 

20 April 2009 can anyone elaborate on case no: 91 ITD 53 (Ban.)?

21 April 2009 answered

21 April 2009 The 2nd appeal in this case is decided by the Karnataka High Court in favour of the assessee.

Citation:- CIT Vs D.Ananda Basappa 309 ITR 329.

Facts and decision:-
Assessee sold a residential house and invested the proceeds in acquisition of two flats combined into make one residential unit. Revenue restricting exemption to invest in one residential house. Section 13 of General claues Act declares that whenever the singular is used for a word, it is permissible to include the plural. The expression "a" residential house should be understood in a sense that the building should be of residential in nature and "a" should not be understood to indicate a singular number.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 June 2026
Accountant (Finance & Compliance)

TRIEYEZ

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 11 July 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 June 2026
Article Assistant

Sharma Chetan And Company

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT , CA SemiQualifie

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details