Hi Members,

I am writing this query to seek help regarding the taxability of the Provident fund amount withdrawn by me during FY 2020-21.

I had withdrawn the full accumulated balance in my provident fund account during May '20 and now may I seek your guidance as to how should I include this amount in my tax return.

For your reference, I have not yet completed 5 years of continuous service and have been taking the benefit of Provident fund deduction in the previous tax returns under Sec-80C.

Further, It will be of great help if you could help me with details regarding taxability of the employer's share and employee's share separately along with the treatment required for interest and base component separately as well. Since, I am confused regarding the same having read a couple of articles online.

Thanks in Advance,

PLease let me know in case you require any further details.

Vikas

Hi All,

I receive a salary from private company monthly around one lakh. i am i the job for past ten years. the salary income received is already subject to tax. now my savings after these many years is around 35lakhs for which bank is paying me savings bank interest which comes to around INR 85,000. whether i need to declare the same in the ITR and pay the tax which is already taxed by my company.Kindly suggest

tcs deducted u/s 206cl can claim refund for salaried person

Sir,
I would like to clarify some doubts regarding GST Input on services provided by the Hotel Booking Agents & Travel Agents.
Why GST Department denied in case POS and supplier state are same but recipient state is different regarding providing the Hotel Booking Services?

For Ex.M/s EST Trip Pvt ltd having office at Chennai & providing the booking services to various clients across India.
When booking the hotel/resort (situated in Pondichery) for its clients having office at Chennai the ITC has been denied since the POS and supplier state are same but recipient state is different. The Hotel raised Invoice with CGST & SGST because supply within its territory .Whether is it correct or it should raise the Invoice with IGST since the recipient of service in Other state even though supply is within the state?

Since to hide the profit of booking agent normally the booking agent, get the bills in their name and raise the bill along with some profit on its clients while arranging hotel/resorts facilities . But in this case the ITC has been denied due to the POS and supplier state are same but recipient state is different. So you are requested to kindly clarify the above .

Anodizing a aluminum spacebar is covered in which sectionits 194C or 194J.

Sir/mam,

We have received 90% of Refund , it is credited to our bank later it is rejected the same we have voluntarily payment through DRC03.

Now my doubt this DRC03 details in Annual Return in Refund columns where I have to fill .

Plz Clarify my doubt

Thanking you,

I want to know whether sub contractors can get receipts in cash and can they show those receipts in 44AD

Does purchase of land in fy 2021 by Pvt. ltd. subsidiary co. requires to pass special resolution? The Company had already passed u/s 180(1)(c), 180(1)(a) and 186 (2)(b) in 2014 for Rs. 1200 crs and has been utilised under FITL of holding company .
Is it required to pass a special resolution as and when the prescribed limit is crossed and while such transaction is taking place every time.
Pls advise. Also advise the procedure and draft resolution for the same.

Sir,
A person maintained a private hospital two places single proprietor.purchases of medicial equipment and other fixed assets payment through on head office place bank account for assests used for branch purpose
Question:
A person total assets head office and branch office value amounts shown in h.o. account books only or separately transferred to b.o. is corrected procedure.

During filling of income tax return of small proprietor (no books of a/c ) , a validation error comes out repeatedly.
Validation error description :- 1) In schedule BP, sum of values entered from 36(iv) to 36 vii) should be equal to sum of " Net profit " declared at SL No 64(id) and 64(iid) in Sch P&L .

Now the actual fact is , as per No 1 validation error , actually both the figures should be different as per their respective values therefore i am really surprised why system asks for that " In schedule BP, sum of values entered from 36(iv) to 36 vii) should be equal to sum of " Net profit " declared at SL No 64(id) and 64(iid) in Sch P&L " I am trying to rectify the error many times but doesn't work. Pls suggest how to move forward.