Applicability of garner vs murray rule

This query is : Resolved

Querist : Anonymous

Querist : Anonymous (Querist)

09 May 2017 While solving sums on dissolution of partnership firm after insolvency of one partner, I noticed that the Garner vs Murray rule concerning adjusting of fixed capitals for any reserves before distributing deficiency of insolvent partner between solvent partners has not been followed in certain sums. From the point of view of exams, should it be followed only when the question specifically asks to do so, or should it be followed irrespective?

Amol S Joglekar

Amol S Joglekar (Expert)
Follow

09 May 2017 Garner Vs Murray rule is to be followed if the debit balance of the Capital account of any of the partners is NOT recoverable from the said partner.
There could be cases, where such a debit balance may not be required to be recovered.... may be due to higher market value OR discount given by creditors and so on....

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok

Similar Resolved Queries

Unanswered Queries

Popular
Recent

Trending Online Classes

Direct Tax Laws & International Taxation May 26,Sept 26 & Jan 27

CA Arvind Tuli

Enroll Now
Audit Fast Track Recorded Batch For May 26,Sept 26 & Jan 27

CA Aarti Lahoti

Enroll Now
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English

CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani

Enroll Now

view all classess

Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

MURALIKRISHNA EDDANAPUDI

Ashutosh Purohit

K.S. ANANTHARAJAN

Rasheed Mohd Abdul

Ravi

Subscribe Now

Applicability of garner vs murray rule

Similar Resolved Queries

Trending Online Classes

Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Quick Links

Browse by Category

Latest Job Openings

CA Final

Manager- Finance and Compliance

Accountant

GST CONSULTANT

Article Assistant

GST CONSULTANCY