43B FOR DEFFERED TAX
This query is : Resolved
19 October 2007
hi,
DISALLOWANCE U/S 43B & 40a OF INCOME TAX OF CURRENT YEAR WILL BE TREATED AS DTA & SAME IS BEEN CONSIDERED FOR CALCULATING DTA/DTL. SIMILARLY WHETHER DISALLOWANCE OF PREVIOUS YEAR ALLOWED DURING THE YEAR U/S 43B & 40a IS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR CALCULATING DTA/DTL? IF WE DONT TAKE PREV YEAR DISALLOWANCE, THEN HOW DTA WILL GET NULLIFIED IN SUBSEQUENT PERIOD RELATINNG TO SAME COMPONENT? SINCE DTA/DTL ARISES ONLY FOR TEMPORARY DIFFERENCE & IT SHOULD BECOME NULLIFIED SUBSEQUENTLY..
DISALLOWANCE U/S 43B & 40a OF INCOME TAX OF CURRENT YEAR WILL BE TREATED AS DTA & SAME IS BEEN CONSIDERED FOR CALCULATING DTA/DTL. SIMILARLY WHETHER DISALLOWANCE OF PREVIOUS YEAR ALLOWED DURING THE YEAR U/S 43B & 40a IS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR CALCULATING DTA/DTL? IF WE DONT TAKE PREV YEAR DISALLOWANCE, THEN HOW DTA WILL GET NULLIFIED IN SUBSEQUENT PERIOD RELATINNG TO SAME COMPONENT? SINCE DTA/DTL ARISES ONLY FOR TEMPORARY DIFFERENCE & IT SHOULD BECOME NULLIFIED SUBSEQUENTLY..
19 October 2007
YES.DISALLOWANCES OF PREVIOUS YEAR ALLOWED DURING THE YEAR TO BE CONSIDERED FOR DTA/DTL.OTHERWISE THESE GET CARRIED WITHOUT ANY REAL MEANING.THESE ARE TEMPORARY DIFFERENCES ON ACCOUNT OF TIME PASSAGE AND DIFF. BETWEEN ACCOUNTIN G IN CO'S ACT AND IT ACT.
I EVEN CAME ACROSS CASES WHERE THE AUDITOR SAYS THE LOSS INCURRED IS A DTA AS THE SAME HAS SAVED THE COMPANY FROM TAXES. BUT THIS IS CARRYING A CASE TO TOO MUCH OF ILLOGIC.THERE IS NO CERTAINITY IN FURURE WHETHER THE ENTIYTY WILL BE IN LOSSES OR PROFITS IN FUTURE.IF IN PROFITS ,IT MAY SET OFF LOSSES.OTHERWISE HOW LONG DO WE CARRY THIS LOGIC?
I WISH ICAI OR INCOME TAX DEPT. TO COME OUT WITH SOME REALISTIC GUIDANCE ON THESE ISSUES, AS PEOPLE HAVE ALRAEDY STARTED FILING CASES ON THESE ISSUES.
AS THESE ARE BELOW THE LINE ADJUST -MENTS,ONLY THE B/S WILL IS SOMEWHAT HAZY AND UNREALISTIC.P&L NOT AFFECTED.
R.V.RAO
I EVEN CAME ACROSS CASES WHERE THE AUDITOR SAYS THE LOSS INCURRED IS A DTA AS THE SAME HAS SAVED THE COMPANY FROM TAXES. BUT THIS IS CARRYING A CASE TO TOO MUCH OF ILLOGIC.THERE IS NO CERTAINITY IN FURURE WHETHER THE ENTIYTY WILL BE IN LOSSES OR PROFITS IN FUTURE.IF IN PROFITS ,IT MAY SET OFF LOSSES.OTHERWISE HOW LONG DO WE CARRY THIS LOGIC?
I WISH ICAI OR INCOME TAX DEPT. TO COME OUT WITH SOME REALISTIC GUIDANCE ON THESE ISSUES, AS PEOPLE HAVE ALRAEDY STARTED FILING CASES ON THESE ISSUES.
AS THESE ARE BELOW THE LINE ADJUST -MENTS,ONLY THE B/S WILL IS SOMEWHAT HAZY AND UNREALISTIC.P&L NOT AFFECTED.
R.V.RAO
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- Value of property in capital gain
- Multiple trade mark
- SALE OF MOTOR CAR BY REGISTERED INDIVIDUAL
- Copyright software
- Regarding TDS Applicability For Director Remuneration
- LC charges in relation to Asset purchased should be Capitalised ?
- Transporter Declaration form
- TDS LATE PAYMENT
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
- Address Change to another state of a Registered Trust with 12AB approval
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
