43B FOR DEFFERED TAX
This query is : Resolved
19 October 2007
hi,
DISALLOWANCE U/S 43B & 40a OF INCOME TAX OF CURRENT YEAR WILL BE TREATED AS DTA & SAME IS BEEN CONSIDERED FOR CALCULATING DTA/DTL. SIMILARLY WHETHER DISALLOWANCE OF PREVIOUS YEAR ALLOWED DURING THE YEAR U/S 43B & 40a IS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR CALCULATING DTA/DTL? IF WE DONT TAKE PREV YEAR DISALLOWANCE, THEN HOW DTA WILL GET NULLIFIED IN SUBSEQUENT PERIOD RELATINNG TO SAME COMPONENT? SINCE DTA/DTL ARISES ONLY FOR TEMPORARY DIFFERENCE & IT SHOULD BECOME NULLIFIED SUBSEQUENTLY..
DISALLOWANCE U/S 43B & 40a OF INCOME TAX OF CURRENT YEAR WILL BE TREATED AS DTA & SAME IS BEEN CONSIDERED FOR CALCULATING DTA/DTL. SIMILARLY WHETHER DISALLOWANCE OF PREVIOUS YEAR ALLOWED DURING THE YEAR U/S 43B & 40a IS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR CALCULATING DTA/DTL? IF WE DONT TAKE PREV YEAR DISALLOWANCE, THEN HOW DTA WILL GET NULLIFIED IN SUBSEQUENT PERIOD RELATINNG TO SAME COMPONENT? SINCE DTA/DTL ARISES ONLY FOR TEMPORARY DIFFERENCE & IT SHOULD BECOME NULLIFIED SUBSEQUENTLY..
19 October 2007
YES.DISALLOWANCES OF PREVIOUS YEAR ALLOWED DURING THE YEAR TO BE CONSIDERED FOR DTA/DTL.OTHERWISE THESE GET CARRIED WITHOUT ANY REAL MEANING.THESE ARE TEMPORARY DIFFERENCES ON ACCOUNT OF TIME PASSAGE AND DIFF. BETWEEN ACCOUNTIN G IN CO'S ACT AND IT ACT.
I EVEN CAME ACROSS CASES WHERE THE AUDITOR SAYS THE LOSS INCURRED IS A DTA AS THE SAME HAS SAVED THE COMPANY FROM TAXES. BUT THIS IS CARRYING A CASE TO TOO MUCH OF ILLOGIC.THERE IS NO CERTAINITY IN FURURE WHETHER THE ENTIYTY WILL BE IN LOSSES OR PROFITS IN FUTURE.IF IN PROFITS ,IT MAY SET OFF LOSSES.OTHERWISE HOW LONG DO WE CARRY THIS LOGIC?
I WISH ICAI OR INCOME TAX DEPT. TO COME OUT WITH SOME REALISTIC GUIDANCE ON THESE ISSUES, AS PEOPLE HAVE ALRAEDY STARTED FILING CASES ON THESE ISSUES.
AS THESE ARE BELOW THE LINE ADJUST -MENTS,ONLY THE B/S WILL IS SOMEWHAT HAZY AND UNREALISTIC.P&L NOT AFFECTED.
R.V.RAO
I EVEN CAME ACROSS CASES WHERE THE AUDITOR SAYS THE LOSS INCURRED IS A DTA AS THE SAME HAS SAVED THE COMPANY FROM TAXES. BUT THIS IS CARRYING A CASE TO TOO MUCH OF ILLOGIC.THERE IS NO CERTAINITY IN FURURE WHETHER THE ENTIYTY WILL BE IN LOSSES OR PROFITS IN FUTURE.IF IN PROFITS ,IT MAY SET OFF LOSSES.OTHERWISE HOW LONG DO WE CARRY THIS LOGIC?
I WISH ICAI OR INCOME TAX DEPT. TO COME OUT WITH SOME REALISTIC GUIDANCE ON THESE ISSUES, AS PEOPLE HAVE ALRAEDY STARTED FILING CASES ON THESE ISSUES.
AS THESE ARE BELOW THE LINE ADJUST -MENTS,ONLY THE B/S WILL IS SOMEWHAT HAZY AND UNREALISTIC.P&L NOT AFFECTED.
R.V.RAO
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- STCG....................................................
- Supply through E-commerce Operators
- Sales return eway bill
- Relief u/s Section 89
- TAN for Partnership
- AMOUNT RECEIVED UNDER COMPULOSRY ACQUISITION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND
- GST Registration Horse racing
- Section 43B(h) – MSME Invoice Paid Before Year End but After 45 Days
- Is E Way Bill Valid If Transport ID Not Mentioned in PART A But Vehicle details mentioned in PART B
- Specified Profession
- Section 54F - Exemption on LTCG in 2026 for HP purchased in 2023
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
