143(1)
This query is : Resolved
25 November 2009
I have got an intimation u/s 143(1) of refund of rs. 380 relating to AY 2008-09. However the AO has charged the LTCG on equity shares @ 20%, thus reducing my amount of refund. As per my knowledge no revision application can be made u/s 263,264 to CIT for intimation against 143(1). The only way out seems to file a revised return u/s 139(5). Can this be considered mistake apparent from record?
25 November 2009
Yes. It can be considered as a mistake apparent from records. So move a petition under section 154(2)(b)for rectification.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CG Tax On residential property
- Post Office RD Interest
- Applicable TDS for Purchase of Flat from NRI
- Building and other construction workers welfare cess act 1996
- Eway bill for machinery reparing
- ITR 3 FILING OF AN INDIVIDUAL (PARTNER IN A PARTNERSHIP fIRM)
- Bank Accounts in Balance Sheet for ITR 3
- Gift of mutual fund units to daughter
- Annual return of gst limit
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
- Reporting of STCG on Property in ITR
- Error while filling exam form November 2026
- Delisted shares sold in off market/ Rebate u/s87A
- In Exports Sales HSN details where to fill
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
