U/s-24(b)
This query is : Resolved
12 July 2009
Hi sir/madam,
Father & son took the Joint housing loan last year for the construction of the SOP(still construction is going on,After 2 years it will be complete).The EMI's for the loan repayment went out of the Joint Bank a/c(SBIndia).(Father actually have the income which is less than the minimum exemption limit i.e, Rs.150000)Now father is giving TO WHOM SO EVER IT MAY CONCERN LETTER to son,to get all the sum(principal+interest) repaid to son to avail the deduction U/s-80C and U/S-24(b).Is father is correct?
1).If not what is the treatment?
2).In this case,is it possible to give the total deduction to son,How?
Please clarify it, Urgent?
Father & son took the Joint housing loan last year for the construction of the SOP(still construction is going on,After 2 years it will be complete).The EMI's for the loan repayment went out of the Joint Bank a/c(SBIndia).(Father actually have the income which is less than the minimum exemption limit i.e, Rs.150000)Now father is giving TO WHOM SO EVER IT MAY CONCERN LETTER to son,to get all the sum(principal+interest) repaid to son to avail the deduction U/s-80C and U/S-24(b).Is father is correct?
1).If not what is the treatment?
2).In this case,is it possible to give the total deduction to son,How?
Please clarify it, Urgent?
12 July 2009
1)This is not valid treatment; it's a clear case of camoflaging.
The deduction of payments will be given as per the certificate issued from the entity from which loan is taken and bifurcated in the ownership ratio.
The deduction of payments will be given as per the certificate issued from the entity from which loan is taken and bifurcated in the ownership ratio.
13 July 2009
The SBI given the certificate of the Loan Repayment to the assessee, In that certificate they have mentioned both the names i.e,Father & son Name,
But ownership ratio is not mentioned. However the House for which construction is going on is Registered in the Both names. Please tell me what is the treatment for this
A.Principal Repaid=20,200
B.Intrest repaid=118800
Father doesnt have the Income Which exceeds the Basic Exemption Limit.Please give the Solution for this?
But ownership ratio is not mentioned. However the House for which construction is going on is Registered in the Both names. Please tell me what is the treatment for this
A.Principal Repaid=20,200
B.Intrest repaid=118800
Father doesnt have the Income Which exceeds the Basic Exemption Limit.Please give the Solution for this?
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Itr 1 processing
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- ITR 1: Details for showing Exempt Income
- Short Term Capital gain on shares bought and sold after 2018 onwards
- ITR returnFY25-26
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- INCOME TAX ON REDEVELOPEMENT OF FLAT
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
