27 December 2013
Mr. A while in employment of an Indian subsidiary (XYZ Pvt. Ltd.)of foreign company (XYZ Inc, USA) received Stock Options of XYZ Inc. during 2004-05 with vesting period of 3 years.
Mr. A transferred to the parent company in USA
Mr. A exercised the option during FY 2010-11. He was non-resident during FY 2010-11, working in USA with parent company.
There was a gain on exercise of option of Rs. 1,00,000/- (difference between FMV and exercise price. There was no capital gain since it was a cashless transaction and stocks were transferred at the time of exercise only.
Ordinarily, had Mr. A been a resident in India and an employee of XYZ Pvt. Ltd. upto the FY 2010-11, the total amount would have been taxable as perquisite under salary.
Facts to be considered: 1. He was non-resident during FY 2010-11 (year of exercise)
2. During the vesting period of 3 year - he was in employment of Indian company for 2 years and US company for 1 year. (most important condition)
26 July 2025
Thanks for the clarification. Here's how the **taxability of ESOPs** would apply in **Mr. A’s case** under Indian income tax law:
---
### ✅ **Key Facts Recap:**
* Mr. A was **granted ESOPs in FY 2004-05** by **XYZ Pvt. Ltd.** (Indian subsidiary) — so **Indian company** granted the ESOPs. * Vesting period = 3 years → i.e., ESOPs vested by **FY 2007-08**. * During this vesting period:
* 2 years: Mr. A was employed in India (Resident) * 1 year: Mr. A was in the US (Non-Resident) * ESOPs were **exercised in FY 2010-11**, while Mr. A was **non-resident**, and there was **no capital gain** (cashless transaction). * **Perquisite value (FMV – exercise price)** = ₹1,00,000.
---
## 🔍 **How Is This Taxable in India?**
### 1. **Taxability of ESOPs under Indian Law:**
Under **Section 17(2)(vi)** of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the **perquisite value of ESOPs is taxed as "Salary"** at the time of **exercise**.
But — **this applies only to the portion attributable to services rendered in India**, if the employee becomes **non-resident** later.
---
### 2. **Allocation of Taxable Income:**
Since the **ESOPs vested over 3 years**, and Mr. A was:
* **Resident in India for 2 years**, and * **Non-resident for 1 year**,
We allocate the ₹1,00,000 perquisite proportionally:
| Service Period | Residency | Allocation | Taxable in India? | | ----------------- | ------------------ | ---------- | --------------------- | | Year 1 of Vesting | Resident (India) | ₹33,333 | Yes | | Year 2 of Vesting | Resident (India) | ₹33,333 | Yes | | Year 3 of Vesting | Non-Resident (USA) | ₹33,334 | No (foreign services) |
✅ **Total taxable in India = ₹66,666** ❌ **Not taxable in India = ₹33,334**
---
### 3. **Why is it taxable in India even if exercised later as Non-Resident?**
Because **the perquisite arises from employment services rendered in India**, even though the exercise happened later while Mr. A was a non-resident.
This is supported by:
* CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 dated 23 April 2014. * Provisions under Section 5(2)(b) (scope of total income of non-residents).
---
## ✅ Final Summary:
| Particular | Amount (₹) | | --------------------------------- | ----------------------- | | Total Perquisite (FMV – Exercise) | 1,00,000 | | Portion taxable in India (2/3) | **66,666** | | Portion not taxable in India | 33,334 | | Tax Head | **Salary Income** | | Tax Year | FY 2010-11 (AY 2011-12) |
Mr. A should report ₹66,666 as **salary income in ITR for AY 2011-12**, and claim **relief under DTAA (if any)** for foreign taxes paid, if applicable.
---
If you want help with DTAA or Form 67 filing for relief under Section 90, I can assist.