Section 271(1)(c)
This query is : Resolved
07 June 2012
dear sir,
one of my client was finished i.tax scrutiny for A.Y. 2009-10. I.T.O. initiate 271(1)(c). I have filed reply against above section with mention of various decision of high court & supreme court. Bascially commission expenses disallowed by I.T.O. after that I surrender that but in order I.T.O. not write that surrendered by assessee.
Can I should go appeal against I.T.O. order ?
please guide me.
thanks in advance
surendra
one of my client was finished i.tax scrutiny for A.Y. 2009-10. I.T.O. initiate 271(1)(c). I have filed reply against above section with mention of various decision of high court & supreme court. Bascially commission expenses disallowed by I.T.O. after that I surrender that but in order I.T.O. not write that surrendered by assessee.
Can I should go appeal against I.T.O. order ?
please guide me.
thanks in advance
surendra
08 June 2012
Penalty proceedings initiated by the AO is altogether different from assessment proceedings.
.
Right now the penalty proceedings have been initiated by him.
.
If the penalty is not finalized by him; you can approach him and "pursue" your case with him on below mentioned grounds.
.
If finalized; definitely you can go into appeal with following more arguments :
.
1. The commission paid could not be duly replied to the "satisfaction of the AO" at the time of assessment proceedings.
.
2. The expenditure is real. The payee is real (attach confirmation; his supporting documents of like PAN card, his bank account where payment has been shown, his Income-Tax Return copy where the said income has been shown).
.
3. Argue before CIT (A) that to buy peace; you agreed to the additions.
.
4. Merely because additions have been made; doesn't mean particulars are "inaccurate" and thus liable to penalty.
.
Right now the penalty proceedings have been initiated by him.
.
If the penalty is not finalized by him; you can approach him and "pursue" your case with him on below mentioned grounds.
.
If finalized; definitely you can go into appeal with following more arguments :
.
1. The commission paid could not be duly replied to the "satisfaction of the AO" at the time of assessment proceedings.
.
2. The expenditure is real. The payee is real (attach confirmation; his supporting documents of like PAN card, his bank account where payment has been shown, his Income-Tax Return copy where the said income has been shown).
.
3. Argue before CIT (A) that to buy peace; you agreed to the additions.
.
4. Merely because additions have been made; doesn't mean particulars are "inaccurate" and thus liable to penalty.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- Itr 1 processing
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- ITR validation error - Balance sheet is not filled
- ITR 1: Details for showing Exempt Income
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- ITR returnFY25-26
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Query regarding TDS on EPFO Higher Pension Arrears*
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
