Sec 44ad
This query is : Resolved
29 July 2014
whether a firm having nil turnover for FY 2013-14 should go for sec 44AD presumptive tax or Sec 44AB tax audit..The firm is having 250000 loss for the year ?
29 July 2014
No
29 July 2014
It should go for the audit.
The logic is that where you are claiming less than 8% profit (ie 8% of ZERO), audit is compulsory.
The logic is that where you are claiming less than 8% profit (ie 8% of ZERO), audit is compulsory.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- Exiting partner in partnership firm in gst portal
- Type of Capital Gain
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Difference in GSTR3B system generated which is correct and actual Payment it asks
- GST ON TRAVELLING BILLS
- Taxability of credit in canara bank ET & T section (NRO)
- Gst on travel by air for business purposes
- Banking Related Issue
- Consequences of Non-Deduction of TDS under Income Tax???????????????
- CASH GIFT FROM BLOOD RELATIVE
- Account freezed for Ineligible ITC Scrutiny for GST Annual Return
- Rent claimed on building given on permissive possession basis
- TDS on property - Form 141 query
- Seeking Advice: High Tax Shortfall on Job Switch + Let-Out House Property Loss in FY 2025-26
- Housing Society-ITR5
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
