Income tax refund
This query is : Resolved
02 August 2017
Is it tough to claim IT refunds from AY 2017-18 onwards??
02 August 2017
No.............
03 August 2017
On what basis you are asking
03 August 2017
If we have claimed more deductions than what we have.. Is it possible to get income tax refund from AY 2017-18 onwards?? Because Dept is issuing notices u/s 143(1)a which asks about clarifications..
03 August 2017
@anil.,
Your query is not cleared.......
So, only can't understand this one for here and also other forums created by you.....
03 August 2017
If you have receipt of deduction then no problem will occur in getting refunds.
03 August 2017
143(1)(a) processing does not go into whether you have claimed excess deduction or not. it checks for general arithmetical accuracy and basic prima facie errors.
so you will get the refund. however, depending on parameters if the case is selected for scrutiny or limited scrutiny then you may have to provide proof for deduction claimed.
so you will get the refund. however, depending on parameters if the case is selected for scrutiny or limited scrutiny then you may have to provide proof for deduction claimed.
03 August 2017
If we have claimed more deductions than what we have.. Is it possible to get income tax refund from AY 2017-18 onwards?? Because Dept is issuing notices u/s 143(1)a which asks about clarifications..
Boss, I fail to understand why we should claim deduction more than what we have?
If we have claimed more deductions than what we have.. Is it possible to get income tax refund from AY 2017-18 onwards?? Because Dept is issuing notices u/s 143(1)a which asks about clarifications..
Boss, I fail to understand why we should claim deduction more than what we have?
03 August 2017
Mr. Anil, what you say is correct in the sense that this year (Asst. Year-2017-18) , 143(1) notice have been received by many assesses asking them to explain under the "e-proceedings" if the ITR figures does not match with Form-16. There are genuine cases where you would not have declared some investments to your employer before the due date declared by the employer for inclusion. in that cases you would have claimed additional deduction under the respective heads, like 80-C , 80-D, etc. Those cases are picked up by the Department and 143((1) intimations are issued. Even in cases where ITR figures and Form-16 figures matches , the Department is issuing 143(1) asking the Assesses to explain the difference under e-proceeding, where there is no difference and no additional deduction. It really pitiable how an assesse will explain imaginary difference!!!!
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Clarification Required on Filing Form 141 for Joint Buyers
- HOUSING LOAN ISSUE
- Taxability of Partnership firm for FY 2025-26
- Portuguese Civil Code IT Return
- TODAY INCOME TAX SITE IS NOT WORKING ANY OFFICIAL EXTENSION
- Can we choose not to report losses in ITR3 if they cannot be carried forward?
- GST Rate for Catering Services
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
