Disallowance under wrong section of income tax act
This query is : Open
24 April 2017
The A.O had disallowed Interest expenditure claimed by the Assessee against Income from House property by invoking provisions of Section 36(1)(iii) of the Act instead of Section 24(b), giving reasons that the Assessee had sufficient borrowed funds and given them on loan without charging interest
Is this treatment valid in law??
If not please quote case laws in support of the same
24 April 2017
Not valid in law because house property income has to be determined by applying section 22 to 27 only.
24 April 2017
Can you please quote case laws where the A.O has invoked wrong section and the appellate authority has deleted the addition on that ground
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- Copyright software
- Transporter Declaration form
- Multiple trade mark
- Value of property in capital gain
- LC charges in relation to Asset purchased should be Capitalised ?
- Form 121 & TDS deduction
- Regarding appeal to GSTAT
- SALE OF MOTOR CAR BY REGISTERED INDIVIDUAL
- Regarding TDS Applicability For Director Remuneration
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
- Address Change to another state of a Registered Trust with 12AB approval
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
