Detemination of pe
This query is : Resolved
04 August 2011
Dear Experts
We are a 100 % subsidry of Nihon Denkei Co. Japan and registered under Companies Act 1956 of India. Now our Japan company sold a equipment with relevent software to our Indian customer. Now that customer has raised some poinst as follow:-
1. Customer asking for a declaration for whether Indian company is a PE of Japan company or not. Becuase due to software service is comes under Tax Deduction.
2. If we are a PE of Japan Company than customer asking for PAN no. but our Japan Company have not PAN no. so in that case can we provide our Indian Company PAN no.
3. If we provide our India company PAN no. than they deducted TDS so how is treated in account of Indian Company and can Indian Company claim for refund that TDS in their return.
So please advice on above points and also provide latest circular/notification/Court Judgement regarding the above points.
We are a 100 % subsidry of Nihon Denkei Co. Japan and registered under Companies Act 1956 of India. Now our Japan company sold a equipment with relevent software to our Indian customer. Now that customer has raised some poinst as follow:-
1. Customer asking for a declaration for whether Indian company is a PE of Japan company or not. Becuase due to software service is comes under Tax Deduction.
2. If we are a PE of Japan Company than customer asking for PAN no. but our Japan Company have not PAN no. so in that case can we provide our Indian Company PAN no.
3. If we provide our India company PAN no. than they deducted TDS so how is treated in account of Indian Company and can Indian Company claim for refund that TDS in their return.
So please advice on above points and also provide latest circular/notification/Court Judgement regarding the above points.
05 August 2011
Hi Bhoop,
Answer to your queries are as follows:-
1.You can provide that Indian Company is not PE of Japanese Company. The same has been provided under Article 5(9) of India-Japan DTAA which reads as under"The fact that a company which is a resident of a Contracting State controls or is controlled by a company which is a resident of the other Contracting State, or which carries on business in that other
Contracting State (whether through a permanent establishment or otherwise), shall not of itself constitute either company a permanent establishment of the other". This simply means Japanese Company having a subsidiary in India shall not mean that it has a PE in India.
2.No, you can't give PAN of Indian Co.,you need to give the same for Japanese company. Obtain PAN for Japanese Company.
3. N.A.
Please feel free for any further clarification in the matter.
Anuj
+91-9810106211
femaquery@gmail.com
Answer to your queries are as follows:-
1.You can provide that Indian Company is not PE of Japanese Company. The same has been provided under Article 5(9) of India-Japan DTAA which reads as under"The fact that a company which is a resident of a Contracting State controls or is controlled by a company which is a resident of the other Contracting State, or which carries on business in that other
Contracting State (whether through a permanent establishment or otherwise), shall not of itself constitute either company a permanent establishment of the other". This simply means Japanese Company having a subsidiary in India shall not mean that it has a PE in India.
2.No, you can't give PAN of Indian Co.,you need to give the same for Japanese company. Obtain PAN for Japanese Company.
3. N.A.
Please feel free for any further clarification in the matter.
Anuj
+91-9810106211
femaquery@gmail.com
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- Capital gain from sale of house property
- Current Account Opening for Sole Proprietorship with Udyam Certificate - Zero Turnover
- TDS on Purchase of Immovable Property by NRI from NRI
- FORM 26A APPLICABILITY
- LC charges in relation to Asset purchased should be Capitalised ?
- Before GSTAT- APL-02 Vs APL-04
- Annual return in Gst
- Regarding TDS Applicability For Director Remuneration
- Multiple trade mark
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
