confused between rule 5 & rule 7


This query is : Resolved 

29 June 2011 Hi everyone,

RULE 5
is applicable "when the excisable goods are sold for delivery at the place other than the place of removal"

RULE 7
is applicable when the excisable goods are not sold for delivery at the time and place of removal.

my confudion-

"sold for delivery at the place other than the place of removal" &

"not sold for delivery at time and place of removal"

both mean the same thing.

so why different rules and different treatment. please clarify. explanation with examplie will be appreciated.

thanks in advance
my id abhipcc@rediffmail.com



U S Sharma (Expert)
30 June 2011 RULE 5. Where any excisable goods are sold in the circumstances specified in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Act except the circumstances in which the excisable goods are sold for delivery at a place other than the place of removal, then the value of such excisable goods shall be deemed to be the transaction value, excluding the cost of transportation from the place of removal up to the place of delivery of such excisable goods.
Explanation 1. - “Cost of transportation” includes -
(i) the actual cost of transportation; and
(ii) in case where freight is averaged, the cost of transportation calculated in accordance with generally accepted principles of costing.
Explanation 2. - For removal of doubts, it is clarified that the cost of transportation from the factory to the place of removal, where the factory is not the place of removal, shall not be excluded for the purposes of determining the value of the excisable goods.

U S Sharma (Expert)
30 June 2011 RULE 7. Where the excisable goods are not sold by the assessee at the time and place of removal but are transferred to a depot, premises of a consignment agent or any other place or premises (hereinafter referred to as “such other place”) from where the excisable goods are to be sold after their clearance from the place of removal and where the assessee and the buyer of the said goods are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the sale, the value shall be the normal transaction value of such goods sold from such other place at or about the same time and, where such goods are not sold at or about the same time, at the time nearest to the time of removal of goods under assessment.

30 June 2011 Yes U. S. sharma is right and has nicely clarified the issue. I agree with him


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
Featured 07 November 2026
Chartered Accountant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 October 2026
Articled Assistant

RRPM & Associates LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 October 2026
Sr. Accountant

SANKARAN & KRISHNAN

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountants/Articles (Freshers/Experienced)

ADY & CO.

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
31 October 2026
Accountants

sankaran and krishnan

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 October 2026
Article Assistant (CA Inter / CMA Inter) - Thrissur

Varma Raja & Associates

Thrissur

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 October 2026
CA Articleship / Article Assistant

M N Rao & Associates LLP

Vijayawada

CA Inter

View Details