banner_ad

Case law [2012] 18 taxxman 265

This query is : Resolved 

28 February 2012 IT : Deduction under section 54F not available where assessee purchased a residential house not from her own fund but from fund borrowed from bank and relatives - [2012] 18 taxmann.com 265 (Hyderabad - Trib.)

Can you provide be any briefings regarding this case...


28 February 2012 Smt. V. Kumuda, Hyderabad. Versus DCIT, Cir-16(2) Hyderabad - Tribunal

Rectification - Capital Gain - Deduction under 54F - Tribunal findings: House purchased from borrowed fund and partly from relatives, sales consideration were not utilized - Assessee applied for rectification of order - Held That:- Tribunal can rectify only those mistake which are apparent from record. Order passed under 254(1) is final. 254(2) does not have existence de hors the order under section 254(1). Re-calling of the order is not permissible under section 254(2). - Recalling of an order automatically necessitates rehearing and re-adjudication of the entire subject-matter of appeal. - Application of assesee turned down.



You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro
CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query



Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details