We are rendering Man power supply services to client. Our client engages that persons to government school projects for taking class.
Now we charge service tax @ 12.36% on the gross bill value to our client.
We entered contract only with our client.
Agreement details between client and government not with us.
End user of the above service lies with government.
we seek opinion regarding the above service exempt from service tax.
Kindly reply at the earliest please.
hi
plz let me know the income tax rates for the assessment year 2008-09 for nov 2008 examination
One of our client is providing AMC for Telecome Equipements. I would like to know the provisions of WCT and Service Tax pertaining to such activity. Please Note that AMC billing is being done in Advance and the amount of material that may be required to be used for the AMC is neither ascertainable nor any benchmark exists for the same.
One of our client is providing AMC for Telecome Equipements. I would like to know the provisions of WCT and Service Tax pertaining to such activity. Please Note that AMC billing is being done in Advance and the amount of material that may be required to be used for the AMC is neither ascertainable nor any benchmark exists for the same.
One of our client is providing AMC for Telecome Equipements. I would like to know the provisions of WCT and Service Tax pertaining to such activity. Please Note that AMC billing is being done in Advance and the amount of material that may be required to be used for the AMC is neither ascertainable nor any benchmark exists for the same.
Court : Appellate Tribunal
Brief : : The assessee was engaged in the business of running a hotel. During the year under consideration it had spent a sum of Rs.7.06 lacs on construction of glass curtain wall on the front side of the hotel, which was in addition to the existing building wall. The assessee claimed that the entire expenditure was revenue in nature which was incurred to improve the look of the existing building and for trendy and better look to attract customers. According to the AO, the work done was of enduring nature and held the same to be capital in nature. On appeal, the CIT(A) observed that the expenses incurred by the assessee resulted in creation of new assets, as it was an addition to the existing hotel building.
Citation : Fition Hotel v. ITO
Judgment :
Tribunal held that there was no merit in holding such expenditure as capital in nature and it allowed the expenditure claimed as current repair
Posted by : CA.Tarun Maheshwari [Scorecard : 481]
It Should Be Treated As Capital Expenditure
one person has taken the cheques of other party and discounted in his bank and bank sent these cheques to concern banker for payment , on the presentation the cheque was returned wothout payment as there was no enough amount in party's bank account. Who will be liable to make the payment to banker as it payment was already taken by holding party
author : teena banwari
Posted On : 8/27/2008 9:02:50 PM
Is preference share holder of a company can do an audit of same company ?
Expert : Jitender
Posted On : 8/27/2008 11:00:14 PM
yes ,he can do.
Plz Provide Relevant Provision Of Companies Act or Any other Act.
author : Anil Kumar Kedia
Posted On : 8/27/2008 11:01:51 PM
My question is that one person or firm is income form interest that is upto Rs. 10-15 lacs then what tax adudit provision will be applicable for the person means turnover limit. please advise.Thanks.
If Interest Income is Above 40 Lacs Tax Audit Is Applicable.
one person has taken the cheques of other party and discounted in his bank and bank sent these cheques to concern banker for payment , on the presentation the cheque was returned wothout payment as there was no enough amount in party's bank account. Who will be liable to make the payment to banker as it payment was already taken by holding party
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
Services provided to government routed through our client