banner_ad

sumit bhartia
09 July 2009 at 15:10

RESOLUTION FOR DIVIDEND

My company has declare a dividend of Re 1 Per share

I need the format of board resolution for dividend decleration that has to be inserted in the minutes


Sona
09 July 2009 at 12:19

issue of shares at premium

Whether a private company which has earlier issued shares at premium, now issue further shares at face value?


SUBRAMONY V
09 July 2009 at 10:07

re appointment of MD

MD of a private company was appointed for 7 years and now the perid of 7 yearas and another 10 months had gone. Actuall he was continuing his position. can his re-appoinment be at a later date ratifying the acts done by him.


MANISH KAPOOR
09 July 2009 at 09:44

Pvt Ltd. Coin a Partnership

Can a Private Limited Co. become partner in a Partner Ship Firm......If Yes Then the treatment if....
a)Out of Seven Directors Two Directors are also the partners in the Firm.
b)Can we give interest on capital & Partners Salary To the Pvt Ltd. Company
c)How is The Pvt Ltd. Company Show this Investment in his books of Accounts.


Muralidharan
08 July 2009 at 19:27

Computation of Net Profits

ABC Limited is a closely held public limited company. During last year (2008) the company had re-appointed its MD for further period of three years. Suitable remuneration was recommended by Remuneration Committee. The remuneration was also approved by Board and Members. The remuneration to MD is Rs.3.00 lacs per month. Since the company had inadequacy of profits, it took the Schedule XIII route to pay remuneration of Rs.3.00 lacs per month.

The remuneration was approved under Sub Paragraph (B) of Section II of Part II to Schedule XIII (Remuneration payable by companies having no profits or inadequate profits) to the Companies Act, 1956. For effective capital of Rs.25.00 crore or more but less than Rs.50.00 crores, the company can pay maximum remuneration of Rs.3.00 lacs per month under schedule XIII

The remuneration paid to MD during the year is more than 5% of the Net Profits. However I am 100% sure that this is not a violation of the Act. This is due to the fact that the remuneration is being paid under Sub-Paragraph B of Section II of Part II of Schedule XIII, which permits companies with no profits or inadequate profits to pay such remuneration as laid down under Schedule XIII.

The accounts for year ended 31.03.2009 are being drawn for approval of Board / Members. In the Notes on Accounts the remuneration paid to MD during the year will be shown separately.

(1) Kindly advise whether it is mandatory for the company to prepare and include in the Notes on Accounts a statement containing “Computation of Net Profit as per Section 198, 309 and 349”.

(2) If the above said “computation” statement is mandatory, then what type of note should I provide in the Notes on Accounts, clarifying about the mismatch between the 5% net profits and actual remuneration paid.

(3) Whether MD remuneration to be disclosed and attached with Boards Report as per Section 217(2A) . Whether MD will be an employee of the company to be covered under Section 217(2A).

I look forward for kind advise

With regards

Muralidharan


Ganesh B

Dear Freinds,

Is it possible to convert a private limited company into LLP unit?

Please comments/suggestions.


Ganesh B

Hello! Friends,

We've registered a company at ROC in 2005.
But, due to some reasons we didn't do any transactions in that company and doesn't file any IT/ROC/Sales Tax returns as on date.
The company was still active in ROC. And recently the auditor of the company also expired due to in-healthy.

Now, shall we go thru another auditor and file IT/ROC as on position. Request your good comments on this.

regards

G Ganesh


CA Gokul
08 July 2009 at 15:37

sec 301

dear friends ,
what are the registers a private limited company has to maintain as per sec301 of companies act . pls explain in a simple term


Ranganath T K

When a senior employee is appointed as an alternate director to a foreign director will the provisions of sec 314 be attracted? There is a 1964 DCA circular confirming this, but is there any more recent ruling on this?


SUMAN
08 July 2009 at 13:30

bord report 217(urgent)

AS PER COMPANIES(DISCLOSURE OF PARTICULARS IN THE DIRECTOR REPORT)RULE 1988,SCHEDULE OF LIST OF INDUSTRIES WHICH SHOULD PROVIDE INFORMATION OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY IS GIVEN IN IT.BUT IN SAME RULES, LIST OF INDUSTRIES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION OF TECHNOLOGY ABSORPTION IS NOT GIVEN.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?DT ALL COMPANIES HAVE TO GIVE INFORMATION OF TECHNOLOGY ABSORPTION IN "ANNEXURE B" WHOSE FORMAT IS GIVEN IN RULES.PLZ CAN ANY ONE CLARIFY OR INTERPRET THIS.THANKS IN ADVANCE FOR CONSIDERING.






CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query

Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details