Audit QnA - Page No 163

All Resolved Open

Vibhor

15 August 2014 at 08:08

Asserts exceeding 5000

As per company act 2013 is there any provision regarding assets which should not be less then 5000?

CA Kratanshu Gupta

15 August 2014 at 00:10

Guidance

how to crack CA Final Audit Paper plz help me

Vivek Rana

14 August 2014 at 11:12

Does company having 35 lacs income from consultancy att 44ab

dear sir,

ours is a private limited company.and providing management consultancy service and business support service.
for F.Y.2012-13 we have gross receipt for such service is 35lacs.there is no other income.Is company is liable to get its account audited U/s 44AB? we have not provided audit report as turnover was less than 1crore. whether it will be considered as business or profession as company is an artificial person.please quote any case related to us.
thank you.

Jayant Sethia

13 August 2014 at 12:30

Stock in trade in form 3cd

I am pleased to know about the calculation of stock-in-trade for stock-in-trade/turnover ratio in Form-3CD.
Reply ASAP.

Thanks in Advance

Vibhor

13 August 2014 at 11:53

Accepting cash exceeding 20000rs

If the business is nature of trading then accepting cash exceeding 20000rs is allowed ?

Anonymous

12 August 2014 at 15:21

Can llp one partner other than ca take the audit assignment

Dear Experts,
I want the expert advice of you on following;
One LLP is formed with three partners two of them are CA and third partner is other than CA
Now question is that, can LLP take audit (any audit) in its name i.e in the name of LLP.
Audit report will be signed by CA Partner.
Thanks n Regards

Deepesh Ashwin Shah

11 August 2014 at 17:36

Partnership

firm has 15 partners. all have to sign financials or can we restrict it to few with some disclosure?

AWDESH MAURYA

11 August 2014 at 15:15

Tds on sale of goods

IS TDS IS ATTRACTED ON SALE OF GOODS MADE

chetna bharuka

11 August 2014 at 12:56

Audit query

sir. is there any change in ca final audit syallbus and specially in professional ethics. because most of the clauses in part 1 of first schedule have link with old companies act .. thanks

Anonymous

11 August 2014 at 10:58