AS 11 vis a vis income tax
This query is : Resolved
12 September 2009
AS 11 states that if there exist outstanding debtors on account of export sales as on 31st March 2009, apply closing rate of relevant foreign exchange and give effect of the same to the amount of said debtors. My question is as follows:
Above effect may result in unrealised foreign exchange gain to loss. Will this gain or loss should be considered for the purpose of determination of tax liability. I feel same should be ignored as the said gain or loss is not realised.
Pls corect me if I am srong
Above effect may result in unrealised foreign exchange gain to loss. Will this gain or loss should be considered for the purpose of determination of tax liability. I feel same should be ignored as the said gain or loss is not realised.
Pls corect me if I am srong
12 September 2009
At the time of debiting the customer's a/c u must have given some value that is final as far as accounting is concerned
12 September 2009
Since the debtors are valued for complying with AS, it has no effect for tax liability.
So no profit or gain shall be considered arising from this for tax liability.
But this have effect for AS 22, deffered tax. It should be taken care of.
So no profit or gain shall be considered arising from this for tax liability.
But this have effect for AS 22, deffered tax. It should be taken care of.
12 September 2009
Dear Sir,
in continuation to my query, i would provide the same in exmaple form.
export sales reported when USD rulling at 46.00 sales bill amounting to USD 100000/- was raised on 20th February 2009. As on 31st March 2009, the same was outstanding. However the dollar rate as on 31st March 2009 was 50/-. Hence there was unrealised gain of Rs. 400000/-. Should it be recorded or to be ignored?. If ignored, there would violation of AS11.
in continuation to my query, i would provide the same in exmaple form.
export sales reported when USD rulling at 46.00 sales bill amounting to USD 100000/- was raised on 20th February 2009. As on 31st March 2009, the same was outstanding. However the dollar rate as on 31st March 2009 was 50/-. Hence there was unrealised gain of Rs. 400000/-. Should it be recorded or to be ignored?. If ignored, there would violation of AS11.
15 September 2009
it was in the nature of revenue & falls in section 37(1) of the income tax act as per ruling of supreme court in woodword governor ltd.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- ADDITION OF CHALLAN IN TDS RETURN FORM 140
- URGENT-Eligible leaves being shown as 24 days for 3 years Articleship instead of 156 days in 108
- TDS AND ITR ISSUE
- LIC maturity claim whether taxable
- Same demand raised for original as well as rectification request return
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
