44ad
This query is : Resolved
16 February 2015
There is a partnership firm taking benefit u/s 44AD and claiming deduction if partner's remuneration which is duly calculated as per 40(b).
Now that partner to whom remuneration is paid is also taking 44AD ka benefit by considering remuneration as gross total income and applying 8% on it
Is it legally valid?
Is there any case law on that
16 February 2015
This is not legally valid claim. Remuneration from partnership firm is fully taxable under income from business for a partner. Therefore cannot show 8% on it. Under 44AD, 8% profit can be shown on gross receipts from business.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- TAN for Partnership
- Treatment of Pension ?annuity returns on PMVY
- LTCG for Assmt year 26-27
- Soyabean hsn code and gst rate
- CA IPCC Registeration in 2012, Is my registration Active or Expired
- AY 26-27 ITR-4 FILING U/S 44-ADA
- Plot of land. Cost of Acquisition
- NON- SUBMISSION OF LLP FORM 3
- Free lancer income
- Long Term Service award taxability in hands of company
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Standard Deduction claim for EPFO Pension and ICICI Prudential Life Annuity
- Small dealers gst returns filing
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
