23 September 2015
There are various SHADEs to your query.
Rightness or Wrongness is dependent on host of questions like Is it earmarked donation/grant? What is the year ending position? What is completion stage of the cold storage? When did you receive the amount?
Presuming your construction of cold storage is completed and it is ready for use.
The disclosure of the same should be
Cost of Cold Storge : XXXXXXXX Less: Earmarked Grant : yyyyyyyy
23 September 2015
2014-15 : Construction completed. Fine.
You said that you transferred the amount of grant to Deferred Grant and Charged to P & L on rational basis of depreciation? In which year you did that?
23 September 2015
I think you better ask your client to refer "AS 12".
Since the cold storage was under construction in the year 2013-14, your action of putting it under Deferred Grant is justified. But the same is not "true and correct" in the year 2014-15. It is no more a Deferred Grant. It is also NOT a RESERVE.From the language of your query, it shows that GRANT is earmarked DONATION....earmarked for COld Storage.
Had the Grant been for the entire project as a whole, then treatment of putting it under capital reserve would have been said to be justified.
But if it is earmarked, you better try to explain your client with AS 12.
23 September 2015
the grant is for the whole project.so its better to transfer to capital reserve.
thanks a lot sir........
and more querry plzzzzzzzzzzzzz
its means we are changing the accounting treatment,that means the accounting policy,so can u pls xplain the procedure the same for changing in accounting polocy
23 September 2015
If it is for Entire PROJECT, then transferring it to Capital Reserve is justified.
Within Capital Reserve you can show it as Reserve on account of Subsidy, in stead of clubbing it with other Capital Reserves.
You are NOT changing the Accounting Treatment as such. What you are doing is asking the management to transfer the Grant to its correct place. So let it come through "Notes to accounts" and let Chairman or Director disclose it in his/her report.
23 September 2015
No its not like that....when the grant shown in the deferred grant amount,we have charged the grant amount to pandl on a rational basis of dep amount,(the extent of dep charged on cold storage is reduced fro the grat and charged to pandl) now if we want the grant amount to be shown in capital reserve the n it will effect the previous year paldl also.......
23 September 2015
Reverse the previous years' entry. Which software you use? The ERP or TALLY-ERP?
In any case, reverse the entry on 01/04/2014.
Report the facts under CARO.. under Fixed Asset : That the treatment given to subsidy during the year 2013-14 has been changed at the conclusion of the fact that the grant is GENERAL and not EARMARKED as envisaged in AS 12.
Make a note of it in Management's responsibility Letter as well.