taxability of loan given to director?

Save Share

This query is : Resolved

Querist : Anonymous

Querist : Anonymous (Querist)

10 November 2009 can any one tell me whether loan given to a director by a private company is taxable in the hands of director? plz also tell the section applicable .

thanks n regards

CA Ravi Sisodia

CA Ravi Sisodia (Expert)
Follow

10 November 2009 SECATION 295 IS NOT APPLICABLE ON PRIVATE COMPANIES. loan given to a director by a private company or public company is NOT taxable in the hands of director.

Bhaskaran Chackrapani Warrier

Bhaskaran Chackrapani Warrier (Expert)
Follow

11 November 2009 Pl read section 2(22)(e) of the Income tax Act,1961.

GSTP Hari Dhayalan Konar

GSTP Hari Dhayalan Konar (Expert)
Follow

11 November 2009 not taxable

Querist : Anonymous

Querist : Anonymous (Querist)

12 November 2009 what if the director is also a sharholder in the company with 9% shareholding

Aashok Kumar Sharma online

Aashok Kumar Sharma

(Expert)
Follow

26 July 2025 The **taxability of a loan given to a director** depends on the **shareholding** and **nature of the company**. The relevant provision under the **Income Tax Act, 1961** is **Section 2(22)(e)** — **Deemed Dividend**.

---

### 🔹 **Relevant Provision: Section 2(22)(e)**

This section **treats certain loans/advances given by a company to its shareholders as *deemed dividend* (i.e. taxable as income)**.

---

### ✅ **Conditions for Section 2(22)(e) to apply:**

1. The company is a **closely held company** (i.e. not a company in which the public are substantially interested).
2. Loan/advance is given to:

* A **shareholder** holding **≥10% voting power**, **or**
* A **concern (firm, HUF, company)** in which such shareholder is substantially interested.
3. The company has **accumulated profits** at the time of giving the loan.

---

### ❌ **If director holds only 9%**:

* Since **shareholding is less than 10%**, **Section 2(22)(e) will *not* apply**.
* Hence, **loan is *not taxable* in the hands of the director**, provided:

* He is **not holding ≥10%** voting power.
* The company is not giving it to a concern where the director is **indirectly a 10% shareholder**.

---

### 🔹 Other Points:

* The **loan may still attract scrutiny under Companies Act**, especially **Section 185** of the Companies Act, 2013 (prohibition on loans to directors), but this is **regulatory**, not tax-related.
* If the loan is given in the **normal course of business** and the company is in the business of lending, **Section 2(22)(e)** also **does not apply**, even if conditions are met.

---

### 📝 Summary:

| Situation | Taxable under Sec 2(22)(e)? |
| -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| Director holds **9% shares** | ❌ No |
| Director holds **≥10% shares** | ✅ Yes, if other conditions met |
| Loan to director **not a shareholder** | ❌ No |
| Loan in **normal lending business** | ❌ No, even if ≥10% holding |

---

Let me know if you want to see implications under the Companies Act or draft language for board resolutions.

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now